Asthma-related health care resource use among patients starting fluticasone or montelukast therapy

被引:7
作者
Allen-Ramey, FC [1 ]
Anstatt, DT [1 ]
Sajjan, SG [1 ]
Markson, LE [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, Outcomes Res & Management, West Point, PA 19486 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2005年 / 25卷 / 12期
关键词
asthma controller; fluticasone propionate; montelukast sodium; propensity score; retrospective analysis; inhaled corticosteroid; leukotriene modifier; asthma; claims data;
D O I
10.1592/phco.2005.25.12.1752
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objectives. To compare patterns of asthma-related health care resource use among patients prescribed fluticasone or montelukast as single-controller therapy for asthma, and to confirm patterns previously observed in retrospective analyses examining outcomes among patients receiving fluticasone or montelukast for asthma. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Data Source. Administrative claims data drawn from United States health insurers in 35 states, covering 17 million privately insured patients. Patients. A total of 4758 patients aged 2-55 years with asthma who were prescribed either fluticasone or montelukast from July 1, 1998-June 30, 1999, were continuously enrolled for at least 24 months, had no evidence of controller therapy for 6 months before the start of drug therapy, and had no evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other respiratory illness. Measurements and Main Results. Patients were identified using an algorithm based on medical and pharmacy insurance claims. Patients were matched between groups based on a propensity score of clinical characteristics and age; this resulted in 1512 patients/treatment group. Asthma-related health care claims incurred for 12 months before and after the start of controller therapy were analyzed. After adjustment, the fluticasone-treated group had greater risk than the montelukast-treated group of requiring therapy with a short-acting beta-agonist in the follow-up period (relative risk 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.20). Odds were similar across treatment groups for needing an emergency department visit and/or hospitalization (odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.74-1.58) and for needing therapy with an oral corticosteroid (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.26). Conclusion. The start of therapy with either fluticasone or montelukast as a single-con troller for asthma was associated with similar asthma-related health care resource use in this matched population.
引用
收藏
页码:1752 / 1760
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Allen-Ramey FC, 2003, ALLERGY ASTHMA PROC, V24, P43
[2]  
Allen-Ramey Felicia C, 2003, Manag Care Interface, V16, P30
[3]   Fluticasone is associated with lower asthma-related costs than leukotriene modifiers in a real-world analysis [J].
Armstrong, EP ;
Malone, DC .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (09) :1117-1123
[4]   Low-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate versus oral zafirlukast in the treatment of persistent asthma [J].
Bleecker, ER ;
Welch, MJ ;
Weinstein, SF ;
Kalberg, C ;
Johnson, M ;
Edwards, L ;
Rickard, KA .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 105 (06) :1123-1129
[5]   Real-world effectiveness of daily controller medicine in children with mild persistent asthma [J].
Bukstein, DA ;
Luskin, AT ;
Bernstein, A .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 90 (05) :543-549
[6]   A comparison of asthma-related expenditures for patients started on montelukast versus fluticasone propionate as monotherapy [J].
Bukstein, DA ;
Henk, HJ ;
Luskin, AT .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (09) :1589-1600
[7]   Low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for first-line treatment of persistent asthma: A randomized clinical trial [J].
Busse, W ;
Raphael, GD ;
Galant, S ;
Kalberg, C ;
Goode-Sellers, S ;
Srebro, S ;
Edwards, L ;
Rickard, K .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (03) :461-468
[8]   Asthma guidelines: A changing paradigm to improve asthma care [J].
Busse, WW ;
Lenfant, C ;
Lemanske, RF .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 110 (05) :703-705
[9]   Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders [J].
Cepeda, MS ;
Boston, R ;
Farrar, JT ;
Strom, BL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 158 (03) :280-287
[10]  
*CHILDH ASTHM MAN, 2000, NEW ENGLAND J MED, V0343