A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods II: Graded testing

被引:8
作者
Chao, Eunice [1 ]
Krewski, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Inst Populat Hlth, McLaughlin Ctr Populat Hlth Risk Assessment, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Genetically modified foods; Graded testing; Risk-based classification; Concern level; Premarket assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.08.002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
This paper presents a graded approach to the testing of crop-derived genetically modified (GM) foods based on concern levels in a proposed risk-based classification scheme (RBCS) and currently available testing methods. A graded approach offers the potential for more efficient use of testing resources by focusing less on lower concern GM foods, and more on higher concern foods. In this proposed approach to graded testing, products that are classified as Level I would have met baseline testing requirements that are comparable to what is widely applied to premarket assessment of GM foods at present. In most cases, Level I products would require no further testing, or very limited confirmatory analyses. For products classified as Level II or higher, additional testing would be required, depending on the type of the substance, prior dietary history, estimated exposure level, prior knowledge of toxicity of the substance, and the nature of the concern related to unintended changes in the modified food. Level III testing applies only to the assessment of toxic and antinutritional effects from intended changes and is tailored to the nature of the substance in question. Since appropriate test methods are not currently available for all effects of concern, future research to strengthen the testing of GM foods is discussed. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   IgE binding to pepsin-digested food extracts [J].
Akkerdaas, JH ;
Wensing, M ;
Asero, R ;
Rivas, MF ;
Knulst, AC ;
Bolhaar, S ;
Hefle, SL ;
Aalberse, RC ;
van Ree, R .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 138 (03) :203-208
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EFSA J
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TOX TEST 21 CENTURY
[4]  
Barlow S., 2005, Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC)
[5]   Adaptation of microorganisms to cold temperatures, weak acid preservatives, low pH, and osmotic stress: A review [J].
Beales, N .
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2004, 3 (01) :1-20
[6]   Food safety: Risk assessment methodology and decision-making criteria [J].
Brock, WJ ;
Rodricks, JV ;
Rulis, A ;
Dellarco, VL ;
Gray, GM ;
Lane, RW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 22 (06) :435-451
[7]   Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops [J].
Catchpole, GS ;
Beckmann, M ;
Enot, DP ;
Mondhe, M ;
Zywicki, B ;
Taylor, J ;
Hardy, N ;
Smith, A ;
King, RD ;
Kell, DB ;
Fiehn, O ;
Draper, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (40) :14458-14462
[8]  
CHAO E, 2007, THESIS U OTTAWA
[9]   A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods 1: Conceptual development [J].
Chao, Eunice ;
Krewski, Daniel .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 52 (03) :208-222
[10]  
*COD AL, 2002, 452003 CACGL