Global Analysis of Anthropogenic Debris Ingestion by Sea Turtles

被引:247
作者
Schuyler, Qamar [1 ]
Hardesty, Britta Denise [2 ]
Wilcox, Chris [3 ]
Townsend, Kathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Moreton Bay Res Stn, Dunwich, Qld 4183, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Ecosyst Sci, Sandy Bay, Tas 7005, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Marine & Atmospher Res, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Caretta caretta; Dermochelys coriacea; Eretmochelys imbricata; garbage; Lepidochelys kempii; litter; rubbish; trash; CHELONIA-MYDAS; CARETTA-CARETTA; MARINE DEBRIS; GREEN TURTLE; FEEDING ECOLOGY; DIET; PACIFIC; IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENT; CALIFORNIA;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12126
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ingestion of marine debris can have lethal and sublethal effects on sea turtles and other wildlife. Although researchers have reported on ingestion of anthropogenic debris by marine turtles and implied incidences of debris ingestion have increased over time, there has not been a global synthesis of the phenomenon since 1985. Thus, we analyzed 37 studies published from 1985 to 2012 that report on data collected from before 1900 through 2011. Specifically, we investigated whether ingestion prevalence has changed over time, what types of debris are most commonly ingested, the geographic distribution of debris ingestion by marine turtles relative to global debris distribution, and which species and life-history stages are most likely to ingest debris. The probability of green (Chelonia mydas) and leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) ingesting debris increased significantly over time, and plastic was the most commonly ingested debris. Turtles in nearly all regions studied ingest debris, but the probability of ingestion was not related to modeled debris densities. Furthermore, smaller, oceanic-stage turtles were more likely to ingest debris than coastal foragers, whereas carnivorous species were less likely to ingest debris than herbivores or gelatinovores. Our results indicate oceanic leatherback turtles and green turtles are at the greatest risk of both lethal and sublethal effects from ingested marine debris. To reduce this risk, anthropogenic debris must be managed at a global level.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 139
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Censo 2010
[2]  
Ashmole N.P., 1967, Comparative feeding ecology of sea birds of a tropical oceanic island
[3]  
BALAZS G.H., 1985, Proceedings of the Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, P387
[4]  
Ballance A, 2000, S AFR J SCI, V96, P210
[5]  
Bell I., 2012, MARINE ECOLOGY, V34, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0485.2012.00522.X
[6]   INGESTION OF MARINE DEBRIS BY JUVENILE SEA-TURTLES IN COASTAL FLORIDA HABITATS [J].
BJORNDAL, KA ;
BOLTEN, AB ;
LAGUEUX, CJ .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 1994, 28 (03) :154-158
[7]  
Bjorndal Karen A., 1997, P199
[8]  
Bolten AB, 2003, CRC MAR BIOL SER, P243
[9]   The stomach contents of post-hatchling green and loggerhead sea turtles in the southwest Pacific: an insight into habitat association [J].
Boyle, M. C. ;
Limpus, C. J. .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 2008, 155 (02) :233-241
[10]   Marine debris and human impacts on sea turtles in southern Brazil [J].
Bugoni, L ;
Krause, L ;
Petry, MV .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2001, 42 (12) :1330-1334