Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks

被引：503

作者：

Lusk, JL ^{[1
]}

Schroeder, TC

机构：

[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA

[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2004年 / 86卷 / 02期

关键词：

CVM; conjoint analysis; heteroskedastic extreme value model; hypothetical bias; multinomial probit; random parameters logit;

D O I：

10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00592.x

中图分类号：

F3 [农业经济];

学科分类号：

0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;

摘要：

This study compares hypothetical and nonhypothetical responses to choice experiment questions. We test for hypothetical bias in a choice experiment involving beef ribeye steaks with differing quality attributes. In general, hypothetical responses predicted higher probabilities of purchasing beef steaks than nonhypothetical responses. Thus, hypothetical choices overestimate total willingness-to-pay for beef steaks. However, marginal willingness-to-pay for a change in steak quality is, in general, not statistically different across hypothetical and actual payment settings.

引用

页码：467 / 482

页数：16

共 48 条

[1] Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].