Evaluating farmers' likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands

被引:86
作者
Beharry-Borg, Nesha [1 ]
Smart, James C. R. [2 ,3 ]
Termansen, Mette [1 ,3 ]
Hubacek, Klaus [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, SRI, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Payments for ecosystem services; Latent class model; Land management incentives; Heterogeneous preferences; WTA; CHOICE EXPERIMENT APPROACH; LATENT-CLASS APPROACH; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SCREE TEST; DESIGN; PREFERENCES; SCHEMES; MODELS; COSTS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-012-0282-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Maintaining drinking water quality is essential to water companies and their customers, and agricultural non-point source pollution is a major cause of water quality degradation. In this paper, we examine the potential use of payments financed by a water company as incentives for farmers to adjust their agricultural land management practices in order to protect water quality. We use a choice experiment (CE) to measure farmers' minimum willingness to accept (WTA) requirements to adjust agricultural land management practices in Nidderdale and the Washburn valley (Yorkshire, UK) under a potential local payment for ecosystem services (PES) programme. Latent class analysis of farmers' CE responses was used to quantify the size and spread of farmers' preferences and minimum WTA values for compensation payments, and to investigate potential drivers of preference variation. Analysis suggested that the emphasis on sheep or cattle/dairy production within mixed farming businesses in this area provides a partial explanation for the considerable observed heterogeneity in preferences and minimum WTA requirements for participation in a potential PES programme.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 647
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Adamowicz W, 1998, TECHNICAL REPORT
[2]   Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: A comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ansari, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (01) :87-98
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EXPLANATION SPECIAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, VALUING ENV NATURAL
[6]   Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture [J].
Antle, J ;
Capalbo, S ;
Mooney, S ;
Elliott, E ;
Paustian, K .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (02) :231-250
[7]  
Armstrong A., 2007, GRIP BLOCKING UPLAND
[8]  
Barr C., 1993, COUNTRYSIDE SURVEY 1
[9]  
Baskaran R, 2009, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V16, P103
[10]   Analysing the agricultural costs and non-market benefits of implementing the Water Framework Directive [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Brouwer, Roy ;
Davies, Helen ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Deflandre, Amelie ;
Di Falco, Salvatore ;
Georgiou, Stavros ;
Hadley, David ;
Hutchins, Michael ;
Jones, Andrew P. ;
Kay, David ;
Leeks, Graham ;
Lewis, Mervyn ;
Lovett, Andrew A. ;
Neal, Colin ;
Posen, Paulette ;
Rigby, Dan ;
Turner, R. Kerry .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) :221-237