Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process

被引:90
作者
Maroto, A [1 ]
Riu, J [1 ]
Boqué, R [1 ]
Rius, FX [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Analyt & Organ Chem, Tarragona 43005, Spain
关键词
uncertainty of analytical results; validation process; traceability; assessment of the accuracy;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00111-7
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A new approach for calculating uncertainties of analytical results based on the information from the validation process is proposed. This approach complements the existing approaches proposed to date and can be applied to any validated analytical method. The precision estimates generated during the process of assessment of the accuracy take into account the uncertainties of preprocessing steps and analytical measurement steps as long as the different factors that influence these steps are representatively varied in the whole validation process. Since the accuracy of an analytical method should be always assessed before applying it to future working samples, little extra work needs to be done to estimate the final uncertainty. Other sources of uncertainty not previously considered (e.g. uncertainty associated to sampling, to differences between the test-sample and the working sample, etc.) are subsequently included and mathematically combined with the uncertainty arising from the assessment of the accuracy to provide the overall uncertainty. These ideas are illustrated with a case study of the determination of copper in contaminated land. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 185
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ANALYST, V120, P2303
[2]  
Barnett V., 1984, Outliers in Statistical Data
[3]  
*BIPM IEC IFCC ISO, 1993, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS
[4]  
*BIPM IEC IFCC ISO, 1993, INT VOC BAS GEN TERM
[5]  
CEN/ CENELEC, 1989, 45001 CENCENELEC EN
[6]  
De Bievre P, 1997, ACCREDIT QUAL ASSUR, V2, P270
[7]   Protocols for traceability in chemical analysis - Part I: Definitions and terminology [J].
de Bievre, P ;
Kaarls, R ;
Peiser, HS ;
Rasberry, SD ;
Reed, WP .
ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 1997, 2 (04) :168-179
[8]  
Dietrich CF, 1991, UNCERTAINTY CALIBRAT
[9]  
*EURACHEM, 1995, QUANT UNC AN MEAS
[10]  
*INT ORG STAND, 1994, 57256 ISO INT ORG ST