Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:190
作者
Liao, Wei-Chih [1 ,5 ]
Chien, Kuo-Liong [1 ,5 ]
Lin, Yu-Lin [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Ming-Shiang [1 ]
Lin, Jaw-Town [4 ]
Wang, Hsiu-Po [1 ]
Tu, Yu-Kang [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[4] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Sch Med, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
FOLINIC ACID; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; GEMCITABINE; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; TRIALS; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; FLUOROURACIL;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70388-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background Major adjuvant treatments for pancreatic adenocarcinoma include fluorouracil, gemcitabine, chemoradiation, and chemoradiation plus fluorouracil or gemcitabine. Since the optimum regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these treatments in terms of overall survival after tumour resection and in terms of grade 3-4 toxic effects with a systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, trial registries, and related reviews and abstracts for randomised controlled trials comparing the above five treatments with each other or observation alone before April 30, 2013. We estimated relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death and relative odds ratios (ORs) for toxic effects among different therapies by combining HRs for death and survival durations and ORs for toxic effects of included trials. We assessed the effects of prognostic factors on survival benefits of adjuvant therapies with meta-regression. Findings Ten eligible articles reporting nine trials were included. Compared with observation, the HRs for death were 0.62 (95% credible interval 0.42-0. 88) for fluorouracil, 0.68 (0 . 44-1 . 07) for gemcitabine, 0.91 (0.55-1 . 46) for chemoradiation, 0.54 (0.15-1.80) for chemoradiation plus fl uorouracil, and 0 . 44 (0 . 10-1 . 81) for chemoradiation plus gemcitabine. The proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes was inversely associated with the survival benefit of adjuvant treatments. After adjustment for this factor, fl uorouracil (HR 0.65, 0.49-0.84) and gemcitabine (0.59, 0.41-0.83) improved survival compared with observation, whereas chemoradiation resulted in worse survival than fl uorouracil (1.69,1.12-2.54) or gemcitabine (1.86,1.04-3.23). Chemoradiation plus gemcitabine was ranked the most toxic, with significantly higher haematological toxic effects than second-ranked chemoradiation plus fl uorouracil (OR 13.33,1.01-169.36). Interpretation Chemotherapy with fl uorouracil or gemcitabine is the optimum adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and reduces mortality after surgery by about a third. Chemoradiation plus chemotherapy is less effective in prolonging survival and is more toxic than chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1103
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Abrams Ross A, 2004, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V13, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.soc.2004.06.004
[2]
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Ades, AE ;
Sculpher, M ;
Sutton, A ;
Abrams, K ;
Cooper, N ;
Welton, N ;
Lu, GB .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (01) :1-19
[3]
[Anonymous], 2011, 3 NICE DSU
[4]
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations [J].
Brooks, SP ;
Gelman, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) :434-455
[5]
Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial [J].
Burris, HA ;
Moore, MJ ;
Andersen, J ;
Green, MR ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Madiano, MR ;
Cripps, MC ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Storniolo, AM ;
Tarassoff, P ;
Nelson, R ;
Dorr, FA ;
Stephens, CD ;
VanHoff, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) :2403-2413
[6]
A prospective pharmacologic evaluation of age-related toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer [J].
Dees, EC ;
O'Reilly, S ;
Goodman, SN ;
Sartorius, S ;
Levine, MA ;
Jones, RJ ;
Grochow, LB ;
Donehower, RC ;
Fetting, JH .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2000, 18 (06) :521-529
[7]
Higgins J., 2009, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470712184.CH8
[8]
Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study [J].
Hurria, Arti ;
Togawa, Kayo ;
Mohile, Supriya G. ;
Owusu, Cynthia ;
Klepin, Heidi D. ;
Gross, Cary P. ;
Lichtman, Stuart M. ;
Gajra, Ajeet ;
Bhatia, Smita ;
Katheria, Vani ;
Klapper, Shira ;
Hansen, Kurt ;
Ramani, Rupal ;
Lachs, Mark ;
Wong, F. Lennie ;
Tew, William P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (25) :3457-3465
[9]
Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. [J].
Hutchins, LF ;
Unger, JM ;
Crowley, JJ ;
Coltman, CA ;
Albain, KS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (27) :2061-2067
[10]
KALSER MH, 1985, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V120, P899