From comparative effectiveness research to patient-centered outcomes research: policy history and future directions

被引:11
作者
D'Arcy, Laura P. [1 ]
Rich, Eugene C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Math Policy Res Inc, Washington, DC 20002 USA
关键词
comparative effectiveness research; health care costs; patient-centered outcomes research; COSTS;
D O I
10.3171/2012.4.FOCUS12106
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Containing growth in health care expenditures is considered to be essential to improving both the long-term fiscal outlook of the federal government and the future affordability of health care in the US. As health care expenditures have increased, so too have concerns about the quality of health care. Better information on the clinical effectiveness of alternative treatments and other interventions is needed to improve the quality of care and restrain growth in expenditures. This article explains the key role played by the federal government in defining the context and process of comparative effectiveness research as well as its funding. Subsequently, the article explores the mission, priorities, and research agenda of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, which is an independent, nonprofit corporation established in 2010 by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.4.FOCUS12106)
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, WHAT EFF HLTH CAR PR
[2]
[Anonymous], 2020, RES C DE LIST OFF PA
[3]
[Anonymous], 2007, Report to the Congress: Promoting greater efficiency in Medicare, Orszag, J. Orszag
[4]
[Anonymous], NAT HLTH EXP AGGR PE
[5]
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]
Comparative Effectiveness Research Relative and Efficient Outcomes in Surgery Patients [J].
Bland, Kirby I. ;
Hoyt, David B. ;
Polk, Hiram C., Jr. ;
Niederhuber, John E. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (04) :550-557
[7]
Bradford H., 2003, Health Affairs, pw3, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.283.
[8]
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2011, NAT HLTH EXP PROJ 20
[9]
*COMM FUND COMM HI, 2006, WHY NOT BEST RES NAT
[10]
Congressional Budget Office, 2011, MAR 2011 MED BAS FIS