Uncertainty, shifting power, and appeasement

被引:60
作者
Powell, R
机构
[1] University of California, Berkeley, CA
[2] Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2945840
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Great Britain faced an immensely complicated strategic problem in the 1930s, and important aspects of it can be stylized as a situation in which a state that is declining iii power is unsure of the aims of a rising state. If those aims are limited then the declining state prefers to appease the rising state's demands rather than go to war to oppose them. If however, the rising state's demands are unlimited: then the declining state prefers fighting. And, given that the declining state is becoming weaker over time, it prefers fighting sooner rather than later if there is to be a war. This situation creates a trade-off: The earlier a state stands firm, the stronger it will be if war ensues, but the higher the chance of fighting an unnecessary war. In equilibrium, the declining state generally tries to appease the rising state by making a series of concessions.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 764
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Chamberlain and Appeasement: British Policy and the Coming of the Second World War
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, PERCEPTION MISPERCEP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Munich: The Price of Peace
[4]  
ASTER S, 1989, PATHS WAR
[5]  
BAGNOLI M, 1989, LOG CONCAVITY PROBAB
[6]  
Barnett Corelli, 1972, COLLAPSE BRIT POWER
[7]   COURTSHIP AS A WAITING GAME [J].
BERGSTROM, TC ;
BAGNOLI, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (01) :185-202
[8]  
Bond B., 1980, BRIT MILITARY POLICY
[9]  
Boyce R.D., 1989, PATHS WAR
[10]  
DEMESQUITA BB, 1992, WAR REASON