Quality utility - A compromise programming approach to robust design

被引:215
作者
Chen, W
Wiecek, MM
Zhang, J
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Mech Engn MC 251, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Math Sci, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[3] Clemson Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.2829440
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In robust design, associated with each quality characteristic, the design objective often involves multiple aspects such as ''bringing the mean of performance on target" and "minimizing the variations." Current ways of handling these multiple aspects using either the Taguchi's signal-to-noise ratio or the weighted-slim method pre not adequate. In this paper we solve bi-objective robust design problems from a utility perspective by following upon the recent developments on relating utility function optimization to a Compromise Programming (CP) method. A robust design procedure is developed to allow a designer to express his/her preference structure of multiple aspects of robust design. The CP approach, i.e., the Tchebycheff method, is then used to determine the robust design solution which is guaranteed to belong to the set of efficient solutions (Pareto points). The quality utility at the candidate solution is represented by means of a quadratic function in a certain sense equivalent to the weighted Tchebycheff metric. The obtained utility function can be used to explore the set of efficient solutions in a neighborhood of the candidate solution. The iterative nature of our proposed procedure will assist decision making in quality engineering and the applications of robust design.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Research in Engineering Design, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01581343
[2]  
[Anonymous], AIAA J
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADV DESIGN AUTOMATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1973, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
[5]   A note on weighted criteria methods for compromise solutions in multi-objective optimization [J].
Athan, TW ;
Papalambros, PY .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 27 (02) :155-176
[6]   A THEOREM CONNECTING UTILITY FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION AND COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING [J].
BALLESTERO, E ;
ROMERO, C .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 1991, 10 (07) :421-427
[7]  
Bazaraa M.S., 2013, Nonlinear Programming-Theory and Algorithms, V3rd
[8]  
Bowman VJ, 1976, LECT NOTES EC MATH S, V135, P76
[9]   SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIOS, PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, AND TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, G .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1988, 30 (01) :1-17
[10]   A COMPROMISE DECISION-SUPPORT PROBLEM FOR AXIOMATIC AND ROBUST DESIGN [J].
BRAS, B ;
MISTREE, F .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1995, 117 (01) :10-19