Systematic analysis of Fresnel CSP plants with energy storage

被引:8
作者
Bachelier, C. [1 ]
Selig, M. [1 ]
Mertins, M. [1 ]
Stieglitz, R. [2 ]
Zipf, V. [3 ]
Neuhaeuser, A. [3 ]
Steinmann, W. D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Novatec Solar GmbH, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Neutron Phys & Reactor Technol INR, D-76344 Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Solar Energy Syst ISE, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany
[4] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Tech Thermodynam DLR TT, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, SOLARPACES 2014 | 2015年 / 69卷
关键词
Linear Fresnel; thermal energy storage; molten salt; phase change material; direct molten salt;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.207
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
080707 [能源环境工程]; 082001 [油气井工程];
摘要
The integration of thermal energy storage (TES) in a concentrating solar thermal plant (CSP) is an exclusive feature of this technology, offering it a superior advantage compared to other solar power generation systems, since it allows an efficient integration in the electricity grid and optimised operation flexibility. Within this article various TES configurations are identified and evaluated in combination with corresponding power block set-ups for a linear Fresnel CSP plant. The study scopes plants utilizing Direct Steam Generation (DSG) or Direct Molten Salt solar fields (DMS SF); Indirect Molten Salt (IMS), Direct Molten Salt (DMS TES) and/or Phase Change Materials (PCM) storage systems; and reheat or non reheat power blocks. Two concepts have been identified offering a credibly high techno-economical potential: the DMS concept and a concept combining a DSG solar field with PCM/IMS TES. The analysis of the power block efficiency versus storage specific energy capacity (amount of stored energy per unit of storage medium mass) exhibits a substantial advantage of the DMS concept. Nevertheless for a better understanding of its techno-economical potential, this option demands further evaluations especially with respect to operational costs. Even though in light of this analysis the DSG+PCM solution seems at first less attractive according to the indicators investigated, the potentially lower cost of PCM TES could allow such a concept to be competitive against DMS, provided that storage component investments and operation costs are lower than for the DMS case. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1210
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2009, P 11 INT C THERM EN
[2]
ASME, 2013, BPVC SECT 8 RUL CONS
[3]
Bachelier C., 2012, 18 SOLARPACES MARR M
[4]
Burgaleta J. I., 2011, 17 SOLARPACES GRAN S
[5]
Falchetta M., 2010, 16 SOLARPACES PERP F
[6]
Hirsch T., 2013, 19 SOLARPACES LAS VE
[7]
Janz G J., 1978, Physical Properties Data Compilations Relevant to Energy Storage
[8]
Koretz B., 2011, 17 SOLARPACES GRAN S
[9]
Novatec Solar GmbH, 2013, NOV SOL START CONSTR
[10]
Pilkington Solar International GmbH, 2000, NRELSR55027925 PILK