Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation

被引:39
作者
Davis, Philip M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Commun, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
SCIENCE; QUALITY; NATIONS; IMPACT; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1087/095315108X378712
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The history and development of the Science Citation Index (SCI) is an example of the power of users in defining and influencing the development of a new technology. The SCI was developed as a tool for the historian of science for the purpose of tracing the history of ideas, but it was appropriated by users for purposes for which it was unintended - as a tool for evaluating the literature, individuals, institutions, and countries. The development of a citation tool gave rise to a debate over what is actually measured by citation. The citation-as-reward camp views citations as indicators of quality and impact, whereas the citation-as-persuasion camp views citations as no more than rhetorical devices. While neither view call fully explain how authors use citations, citation-as-reward prevails as the dominant interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条