Poor base stacking at DNA lesions may initiate recognition by many repair proteins

被引:85
作者
Yang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] NIDDKD, Mol Biol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
BER; NER; MMR; base unstacking; lesion; recognition; proofreading;
D O I
10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.02.004
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
A fundamental question in DNA repair is how a mismatched or modified base is detected when embedded in millions to billions of normal base pairs. A survey of the literature and structural database reveals a common feature in all repair protein-DNA complexes: the DNA double helix is discontinuous at a lesion site due to base unstacking, kinking and/or nucleotide extrusion. Lesions induce destabilization and distortion of short linear DNAs, and underwinding in negatively supercoiled DNA presumably could compound the reduced stability caused by a lesion. A hypothesis is thus put forward that DNA lesion recognition occurs in two steps. Repair proteins initially recognize the weakened base stacking, and thus a flexible hinge at a DNA lesion. Sampling of flexible hinges rather than all DNA base pairs can reduce the task of finding a lesion by two to three orders of magnitude, from searching millions base pairs to thousands. After the initial encounter, a repair protein scrutinizes the shape, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic potentials of bases at the flexible hinge and dissociates if it is not a correct substrate. MutS, which has a broad range of substrates, actively dissociates from non-specific binding via an ATP-dependent proofreading mechanism. A single lesion may thus be sampled by BER, NER and MMR proteins until repaired. This proposition immediately suggests a mechanism for crosstalk between different repair and signaling pathways. It also raises the possibility that sampling of a lesion by one protein could facilitate loading of another by direct protein-protein or DNA mediated interactions. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 666
页数:13
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   MutS mediates heteroduplex loop formation by a translocation mechanism [J].
Allen, DJ ;
Makhov, A ;
Grilley, M ;
Taylor, J ;
Thresher, R ;
Modrich, P ;
Griffith, JD .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1997, 16 (14) :4467-4476
[2]   Asymmetric ATP binding and hydrolysis activity of the Thermus aquaticus MutS dimer is key to modulation of its interactions with mismatched DNA [J].
Antony, E ;
Hingorani, MM .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 43 (41) :13115-13128
[3]  
Aravind L, 2001, GENOME BIOL, V2
[4]   Structure of a repair enzyme interrogating undamaged DNA elucidates recognition of damaged DNA [J].
Banerjee, A ;
Yang, W ;
Karplus, M ;
Verdine, GL .
NATURE, 2005, 434 (7033) :612-618
[5]   Crystal structure of a G:T/U mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase:: Mismatch recognition by complementary-strand interactions [J].
Barrett, TE ;
Savva, R ;
Panayotou, G ;
Barlow, T ;
Brown, T ;
Jiricny, J ;
Pearl, LH .
CELL, 1998, 92 (01) :117-129
[6]   New insights into the structure of abasic DNA from molecular dynamics simulations [J].
Barsky, D ;
Foloppe, N ;
Ahmadia, S ;
Wilson, DM ;
MacKerell, AD .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (13) :2613-2626
[7]   DETERMINATION OF DNA PERSISTENCE LENGTH BY CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY - SEPARATION OF THE STATIC AND DYNAMIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE APPARENT PERSISTENCE LENGTH OF DNA [J].
BEDNAR, J ;
FURRER, P ;
KATRITCH, V ;
STASIAK, AZ ;
DUBOCHET, J ;
STASIAK, A .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 254 (04) :579-591
[8]   Modulation of MutS ATP hydrolysis by DNA cofactors [J].
Bjornson, KP ;
Allen, DJ ;
Modrich, P .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 39 (11) :3176-3183
[9]   DNA CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE PRODUCED BY THE SITE-SPECIFIC INTERSTRAND CROSS-LINK OF TRANS-DIAMMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM(II) [J].
BRABEC, V ;
SIP, M ;
LENG, M .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 32 (43) :11676-11681
[10]   Modulation of the toxic and mutagenic effects induced by methyl methanesulfonate in Chinese hamster ovary cells by overexpression of the rat N-alkylpurine-DNA glycosylase [J].
Calléja, F ;
Jansen, JG ;
Vrieling, H ;
Laval, F ;
van Zeeland, AA .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1999, 425 (02) :185-194