Cumulative Low Back Load at Work as a Risk Factor of Low Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study

被引:148
作者
Coenen, Pieter [1 ,2 ]
Kingma, Idsart [1 ,2 ]
Boot, Cecile R. L. [2 ,3 ]
Twisk, Jos W. R. [4 ]
Bongers, Paulien M. [2 ,5 ]
van Dieen, Jaap H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, MOVE Res Inst Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Body Work, Res Ctr Phys Act Work & Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO, Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO, Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] TNO Hlth Living, NL-2132 JJ Hoofddorp, Netherlands
关键词
Low back loading; Ergonomics; Workers; Longitudinal studies; Observational studies; PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS; LEISURE-TIME; EXPOSURE; POSTURE; ADJUSTMENTS; RELIABILITY; DISORDERS; WORKPLACE; ROTATION; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-012-9375-z
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
Purpose Much research has been performed on physical exposures during work (e.g. lifting, trunk flexion or body vibrations) as risk factors for low back pain (LBP), however results are inconsistent. Information on the effect of doses (e.g. spinal force or low back moments) on LBP may be more reliable but is lacking yet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prospective relationship of cumulative low back loads (CLBL) with LBP and to compare the association of this mechanical load measure to exposure measures used previously. Methods The current study was part of the Study on Musculoskeletal disorders, Absenteeism and Health (SMASH) study in which 1,745 workers completed questionnaires. Physical load at the workplace was assessed by video-observations and force measurements. These measures were used to calculate CLBL. Furthermore, a 3-year follow-up was conducted to assess the occurrence of LBP. Logistic regressions were performed to assess associations of CLBL and physical risk factors established earlier (i.e. lifting and working in a flexed posture) with LBP. Furthermore, CLBL and the risk factors combined were assessed as predictors in logistic regression analyses to assess the association with LBP. Results Results showed that CLBL is a significant risk factor for LBP (OR: 2.06 (1.32-3.20)). Furthermore, CLBL had a more consistent association with LBP than two of the three risk factors reported earlier. Conclusions From these results it can be concluded that CLBL is a risk factor for the occurrence of LBP, having a more consistent association with LBP compared to most risk factors reported earlier.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2000, MATL 7 7 0
[2]
[Anonymous], OCCUP HYG
[3]
Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain?: Results of a prospective cohort study [J].
Ariëns, GAM ;
Bongers, PM ;
Douwes, M ;
Miedema, MC ;
Hoogendoorn, WE ;
van der Wal, G ;
Bouter, LM ;
van Mechelen, W .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (03) :200-207
[4]
Spinal Mechanical Load as a Risk Factor for Low Back Pain - A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies [J].
Bakker, Eric W. P. ;
Verhagen, Arianne P. ;
van Trijffel, Emiel ;
Lucas, Cees ;
Koes, Bart W. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (08) :E281-E293
[5]
Interrater Reliability of Posture Observations [J].
Bao, Stephen ;
Howard, Ninica ;
Spielholz, Peregrin ;
Silverstein, Barbara ;
Polissar, Nayak .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2009, 51 (03) :292-309
[6]
FATIGUE FRACTURE OF HUMAN LUMBAR VERTEBRAE [J].
BRINCKMANN, P ;
JOHANNLEWELING, N ;
HILWEG, D ;
BIGGEMANN, M .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1987, 2 (02) :94-96
[7]
Burdorf A, 2010, SCAND J WORK ENV HEA, V36, P1
[8]
de Jonge J, 2000, J Occup Health Psychol, V5, P256, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.256
[9]
Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters [J].
de Leva, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (09) :1223-1230
[10]
VALIDATION OF A DYNAMIC LINKED SEGMENT MODEL TO CALCULATE JOINT MOMENTS IN LIFTING [J].
DELOOZE, MP ;
KINGMA, I ;
BUSSMANN, JBJ ;
TOUSSAINT, HM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 7 (03) :161-169