Opposite contributions of trunk and leg fat mass with plasma lipase activities: The Hoorn Study

被引:32
作者
Bos, G
Snijder, MB
Nijpels, G
Dekker, JM
Stehouwer, CDA
Bouter, LM
Heine, RJ
Jansen, H
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Ctr Prevent & Hlth Serv Res, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] VU Univ, Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] VU Univ, Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Internal Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Chem, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
OBESITY RESEARCH | 2005年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
lipase activity; intra-abdominal fat; femoral fat; DXA;
D O I
10.1038/oby.2005.221
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL) are essential in hydrolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. LPL activity is negatively, whereas HL activity is positively, associated with total body fat. We determined the associations of trunk and leg fat mass with plasma LPL and HL activities in a cross-sectional study. Research Methods and Procedures: LPL and HL activities were determined in post-heparin plasma in a sample of 197 men and 209 women, 60 to 87 years of age. A total body DXA scan was performed to determine trunk and leg fat mass. Results: In women, but not in men, trunk fat mass was negatively associated with LPL activity, whereas leg fat mass was positively associated, after mutual adjustment and adjustment for age. Standardized beta s (95% confidence interval) for trunk and leg fat mass were -0.24 (-0.41; -0.08) and 0.14 (-0.02; 0.31), respectively (interaction by sex, p = 0.03). Larger trunk fat mass was associated with higher HL activity in men [0.48 (0.28; 0.68)] and women [0.40 (0.24; 0.56)]. A negative association of leg fat mass and HL activity was observed in men, although not statistically significant [-0.13 (-0.33; 0.06)], and in women [-0.28 (-0.38; -0.18)]. Discussion: Abdominal fat is associated with unfavorable and femoral fat with favorable LPL and HL activities in plasma.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1823
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]   DIFFERENCES IN LIPOLYSIS BETWEEN HUMAN SUBCUTANEOUS AND OMENTAL ADIPOSE TISSUES [J].
ARNER, P .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1995, 27 (04) :435-438
[4]   Race differences in the response of postheparin plasma lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activities to endurance exercise training in men -: Results from the HERITAGE Family Study [J].
Bergeron, J ;
Couillard, C ;
Després, JP ;
Gagnon, J ;
Leon, AS ;
Rao, DC ;
Skinner, JS ;
Wilmore, JH ;
Bouchard, C .
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2001, 159 (02) :399-406
[5]   Atorvastatin dose-dependently decreases hepatic lipase activity in type 2 diabetes -: Effect of sex and the LIPC promoter variant [J].
Berk-Planken, IIL ;
Hoogerbrugge, N ;
Stolk, RP ;
Bootsma, AH ;
Jansen, H .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (02) :427-432
[6]  
Betteridge DJ, 1999, EUR J CLIN INVEST, V29, P12
[7]   METABOLIC IMPLICATIONS OF BODY-FAT DISTRIBUTION [J].
BJORNTORP, P .
DIABETES CARE, 1991, 14 (12) :1132-1143
[8]   The contribution of intraabdominal fat to gender differences in hepatic lipase activity and low/high density lipoprotein heterogeneity [J].
Carr, MC ;
Hokanson, JE ;
Zambon, A ;
Deeb, SS ;
Barrett, PHR ;
Purnell, JQ ;
Brunzell, JD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2001, 86 (06) :2831-2837
[9]   Insulin sensitivity index, acute insulin response, and glucose effectiveness in a population-based sample of 380 young healthy Caucasians - Analysis of the impact of gender, body fat, physical fitness, and life-style factors [J].
Clausen, JO ;
BorchJohnsen, K ;
Ibsen, H ;
Bergman, RN ;
Hougaard, P ;
Winther, K ;
Pedersen, O .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1996, 98 (05) :1195-1209
[10]   Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population - The Hoorn study [J].
de Vegt, F ;
Dekker, JM ;
Jager, A ;
Hienkens, E ;
Kostense, PJ ;
Stehouwer, CDA ;
Nijpels, G ;
Bouter, LM ;
Heine, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (16) :2109-2113