Influence of relative fat content information on responses to three foods

被引:61
作者
Westcombe, A [1 ]
Wardle, J [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND, HLTH BEHAV UNIT, DEPT EPIDEMIOL & PUBL HLTH, LONDON, ENGLAND
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/appe.1996.0066
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Thirty-six normal-weight participants each tasted and rated three cheeses, three yoghurts and three ''koerrtas'' (a novel, tofu-based food) on several hedonic, intention and sensory dimensions. Each sample was labelled as either ''Higher'' (than normal fat content), ''Normal'', or ''Lower'' (than normal fat content) while the actual fat content remained virtually constant. Cheese and yoghurt were chosen as consumers thought them to be high and low fat foods respectively in pre-testing. The presence of significant and predictable label effects on dimensions such as perceived healthiness and amount of fat demonstrated the efficacy of the manipulation. The Lower labelled foods were rated slightly less pleasant than the Normal but there was no interaction with type of food. However, there was an interaction with food type for rated likelihood of buying: participants were more likely to buy the Lower labelled yoghurt than the Normal or Higher yoghurts. Participant characteristics were important moderators of the effect of the dietary fat-related labels. Those participants who reported a greater perceived influence of general health concerns on food choice, for example, rated the higher fat labelled foods as less pleasant and tended to be less likely to buy the higher labelled yoghurts and cheeses than those who reported a lower perceived influence. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 62
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   THE INFLUENCES OF ATTITUDES, BELIEFS AND LABEL INFORMATION ON PERCEPTIONS OF REDUCED-FAT SPREAD [J].
AARON, JI ;
MELA, DJ ;
EVANS, RE .
APPETITE, 1994, 22 (01) :25-37
[2]   INFLUENCE OF BEER BRAND IDENTIFICATION ON TASTE PERCEPTION [J].
ALLISON, RI ;
UHL, KP .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1964, 1 (03) :36-39
[3]   EFFECTS OF EXPECTANCIES AND PERSONALIZED FEEDBACK ON FAT CONSUMPTION, TASTE, AND PREFERENCE [J].
BOWEN, DJ ;
TOMOYASU, N ;
ANDERSON, M ;
CARNEY, M ;
KRISTAL, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (13) :1061-1079
[4]  
Cardello A. V., 1992, Journal of Sensory Studies, V7, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1992.tb00194.x
[5]  
Cardello A.V., 1994, MEASUREMENT FOOD PRE, P253, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_10
[6]  
DREWNOWSKI A, 1992, NUTR REV, V50, P17
[7]   How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread [J].
Kahkonen, P ;
Tuorila, H ;
Rita, H .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 1996, 7 (02) :87-94
[8]  
KRISTAL A R, 1990, Health Education Research, V5, P467, DOI 10.1093/her/5.4.467
[9]   HEALTH AS A VALUE - METHODOLOGICAL AND THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
LAU, RR ;
HARTMAN, KA ;
WARE, JE .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 5 (01) :25-43
[10]  
LUNDGREN B, 1981, CRITERIA FOOD ACCEPT, P27