The C terminus of a chloroplast precursor modulates its interaction with the translocation apparatus and PIRAC

被引:44
作者
Dabney-Smith, C
van den Wijngaard, PWJ
Treece, Y
Vredenberg, WJ
Bruce, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Biochem Cellular & Mol Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Legume Res, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] Wageningen Univ Agr, Lab Plant Physiol, NL-6703 BD Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.274.45.32351
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The import of proteins into chloroplasts involves a cleavable, N-terminal targeting sequence known as the transit peptide. Although the transit peptide is both necessary and sufficient to direct precursor import into chloroplasts, the mature domain of some precursors has been shown to modulate targeting and translocation efficiency. To test the influence of the mature domain of the small subunit of Rubisco during import in vitro, the precursor (prSSU), the mature domain (mSSU), the transit peptide (SS-tp), and three C-terminal deletion mutants (Delta 52, Delta 67, and Delta 74) of prSSU were expressed and purified from Escherichia coli, Activity was then evaluated by competitive import of S-35-prSSU. Both IC50 and K-i values consistently suggest that removal of C-terminal prSSU sequences inhibits its interaction with the translocation apparatus. Non-competitive import studies demonstrated that prSSU and Delta 52 were properly processed and accumulated within the chloroplast, whereas Delta 67 and Delta 74 were rapidly degraded via a plastid-localized protease, The ability of prSSU-derived proteins to induce inactivation of the protein-import-related anion channel was also evaluated, Although the C-terminal deletion mutants were less effective at inducing channel closure upon import, they did not effect the mean duration of channel closure. Possible mechanisms by which C-terminal residues of prSSU modulate chloroplast targeting are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:32351 / 32359
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Identification of protein transport complexes in the chloroplastic envelope membranes via chemical cross-linking [J].
Akita, M ;
Nielsen, E ;
Keegstra, K .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1997, 136 (05) :983-994
[2]  
BRUCE BD, 1994, ADV MOL CELL BIOL MO, V10, P3289
[3]  
Bruce BD, 1994, PLANT MOL BIOL MANUA, P1
[4]   Protein import into chloroplasts [J].
Chen, XJ ;
Schnell, DJ .
TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (06) :222-227
[5]   MULTIPLE PATHWAYS FOR PROTEIN-TRANSPORT INTO OR ACROSS THE THYLAKOID MEMBRANE [J].
CLINE, K ;
HENRY, R ;
LI, CJ ;
YUAN, JG .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1993, 12 (11) :4105-4114
[6]  
Colquhoun David, 1995, P483
[7]   Degradation of mistargeted OEE33 in the chloroplast stroma [J].
Halperin, T ;
Adam, Z .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 30 (05) :925-933
[8]   IMPROVED PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION CURRENT RECORDING FROM CELLS AND CELL-FREE MEMBRANE PATCHES [J].
HAMILL, OP ;
MARTY, A ;
NEHER, E ;
SAKMANN, B ;
SIGWORTH, FJ .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 391 (02) :85-100
[9]   A RECEPTOR COMPONENT OF THE CHLOROPLAST PROTEIN TRANSLOCATION MACHINERY [J].
HIRSCH, S ;
MUCKEL, E ;
HEEMEYER, F ;
VONHEIJNE, G ;
SOLL, J .
SCIENCE, 1994, 266 (5193) :1989-1992
[10]  
IVEY R, 2000, IN PRESS CELL STRESS