Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis

被引:326
作者
Dziallas, Marisa [1 ]
Blind, Knut [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Chair Innovat Econ, Marchstr 23, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Open Commun Syst FOKUS, Kaiserin Augusta Allee 31, D-10589 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Innovation indicators; Innovation factors; Ex-ante and ex-post; Innovation process; New product development; Innovation evaluation; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT SUCCESS; FUZZY FRONT-END; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; FIRM-LEVEL; MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRY; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; SERVICE SECTOR; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
How to evaluate innovations, especially in the beginning of new product development, is a question constantly posed by academics, managers, and policymakers. One reason for this is that improved front-end decisions greatly affect company performance. To find the answers to this question, this review article analyzes scientific publications on innovation indicators published between 1980 and 2015. The objective of this article is to increase the understanding of the indicator landscape and to complement the various stages of the innovation process with relevant indicators. In doing so, this study categorizes the identified indicators into company specific and contextual dimensions. Furthermore, this study analyzes the indicators in terms of their potential for ex-ante and ex-post evaluation and investigates the characteristics of relevant publications. The analysis finds that more process rather than product indicators exist in the literature. Current publications emphasize qualitative and indirect indicators but neglect indicators for the early stages of the innovation process. The review identifies 82 unique indicators to evaluate innovations including 26 indicators for the early stages. The results can help managers, researchers, and policymakers to better understand the innovation process and the indicator landscape. However, more concrete indicators are needed to improve front-end innovation decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 29
页数:27
相关论文
共 292 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1989, KYKLOS, V42, P171
[2]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[3]   Innovation management measurement: A review [J].
Adams, R ;
Bessant, J ;
Phelps, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 8 (01) :21-47
[4]   Assessing your organization's potential for value innovation [J].
Aiman-Smith, L ;
Goodrich, N ;
Roberts, D ;
Scinta, J .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2005, 48 (02) :37-42
[5]   Innovation and Competitive Power [J].
Akis, Elife .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, :1311-1320
[6]   Measuring innovation: the use of indicators in developed countries [J].
Al-Mubaraki, Hanadi Mubarak ;
Muhammad, Ali Husain ;
Busler, Michael .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 11 (03) :220-230
[7]   Innovation assessment in traditional industries. A proposal of aesthetic innovation indicators [J].
Alcaide-Marzal, Jorge ;
Tortajada-Esparza, Enrique .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 72 (01) :33-57
[8]  
Alderson P., 2004, COCHRANE REV HDB 4 2
[9]   Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test [J].
Alegre, Joaquin ;
Chiva, Ricardo .
TECHNOVATION, 2008, 28 (06) :315-326
[10]  
[Anonymous], TECHNOLOGY EC KEY RE