Study on the performance of contour vegetative barriers in an arid region using numerical models

被引:9
作者
Sharma, KD [1 ]
Joshi, NL
Singh, HP
Bohra, DN
Kalla, AK
Joshi, PK
机构
[1] Cent Arid Zone Res Inst, Jodhpur 342003, Rajasthan, India
[2] Cent Res Inst Dry Land Agr, Hyderabad 500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
simulation; vegetative barriers; vertical interval; soil moisture; runoff; surface storage; transpiration; yield;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00114-0
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to evaluate and derive the optimum spacing of contour vegetative barriers (CVB) of locally adapted, drought resistant plant species as soil and water conservation measures for rainfed crop-fields in an arid region. Adapted perennial grasses performed the best and formed effective barriers against soil erosion. Runoff volume and specific peak discharge were reduced by 28 to 97% and 22 to 96%, respectively using CVB with negligible soil loss. The resultant increase in soil moisture storage increased pearl millet crop yield by 35%. Hydrologic processes with respect to crop response for digitally generated CVB layouts were simulated using the distributed numerical models SWAMREG (rainfall-runoff) and SWACROP (moisture storage-plant transpiration-crop yield), and a personal computer-based geographic information system (GIS) for designing optimum CVB spacing. Inputs needed for these models are soil hydraulic parameters, daily meteorological data, and crop characteristics. Simulated outputs were validated with the observed runoff soil moisture storage and pearl millet yield data. At an optimum simulated vertical spacing of CVB between 0.5 and 0.6 m, 24% reduction in runoff resulted in better moisture regime and crop yield improvement by 70% over control. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 56
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Abujamin S., 1988, SOIL EROSION ITS COU, P112
[2]  
Ankenbrand E., 1989, Soil erosion protection measures in Europe, Proceedings of the European Community Workshop, Freising, Germany., P167
[3]   SIMULATION-MODEL OF THE WATER-BALANCE OF A CROPPED SOIL - SWATRE [J].
BELMANS, C ;
WESSELING, JG ;
FEDDES, RA .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1983, 63 (3-4) :271-286
[4]  
BRUCE R. R., 1956, Soil Science Society of America. Proceedings, V20, P458
[5]  
Clark J. E., 1992, Erosion, debris flow and environment in mountain regions: proceedings of the International Symposium held at Chengdu, China, 5-9 July 1992., P387
[6]   TESTING AND COMPARISON OF 3 UNSATURATED SOIL-WATER FLOW MODELS [J].
CLEMENTE, RS ;
DEJONG, R ;
HAYHOE, HN ;
REYNOLDS, WD ;
HARES, M .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1994, 25 (02) :135-152
[7]  
Dabney SM, 1995, T ASAE, V38, P1719, DOI 10.13031/2013.27999
[8]   Vetiver grass hedges for erosion control on a cropped flood plain: Hedge hydraulics [J].
Dalton, PA ;
Smith, RJ ;
Truong, PNV .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1996, 31 (1-2) :91-104
[9]  
Doorenbos J., 1979, YIELD RESPONSE WATER, P257
[10]  
Feddes R. A., 1978, Simulation of field water use and crop yield.