Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

被引:67
作者
Huang, WH
Nakashima, DK
Rumney, PJ
Keegan, KA
Chan, K
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Long Beach Mem Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Long Beach, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01652-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a short interdelivery interval is associated with decreased rate of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was conducted. Patients with previous cesarean delivery who attempted VBAC were identified. The analysis was limited to patients at term with one prior cesarean. The interdelivery interval was calculated in months between the index pregnancy and prior cesarean delivery. RESULTS: A total of 1516 subjects who attempted VBAC were identified among 24,162 deliveries, with complete data available in 1185 cases. The VBAC success rate was 79.0% for patients with an interdelivery interval less than 19 months compared with 85.5% for patients with an interval delivery greater than or equal to 19 months (P = .12). For patients whose labors were induced, interdelivery intervals of less than 19 months were associated with a decreased rate of VBAC success when compared with longer intervals (P < .01). Sufficient power (beta = .95) existed to detect a 64% difference between the groups (alpha = .05). No significant difference was detected in women who underwent spontaneous labor (P = .98). There was no difference in the rate of symptomatic uterine rupture (P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Interdelivery intervals of less than 19 months were associated with a decreased rate of VBAC success in patients who underwent induction, a difference not found in those with spontaneous labor. (C) 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 44
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1999, ACOG PRACT B, V5
[2]   Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections [J].
Dicle, O ;
Kucukler, C ;
Pirnar, T ;
Erata, Y ;
Posaci, C .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (01) :31-34
[3]   Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: A case-control study [J].
Esposito, MA ;
Menihan, CA ;
Malee, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (05) :1180-1183
[4]  
MARSHAK JD, 2000, OBSTET GYNECOL, V95, pS38
[5]   Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section [J].
McMahon, MJ ;
Luther, ER ;
Bowes, WA ;
Olshan, AF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (10) :689-695
[6]  
Phelan J. P., 1996, OBG MANAGE, P62
[7]   The cesarean scar - An experimental study [J].
Schwarz, OH ;
Paddock, R ;
Bortnick, AR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1938, 36 :962-972
[8]  
SCOTT JR, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P811
[9]   Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture [J].
Shipp, TD ;
Zelop, CM ;
Repke, JT ;
Cohen, A ;
Lieberman, E .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02) :175-177
[10]   OBSTETRIC PARAMETERS AFFECTING SUCCESS IN A TRIAL OF LABOR - DESIGNATION OF A SCORING SYSTEM [J].
TROYER, LR ;
PARISI, VM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (04) :1099-1104