Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility

被引:971
作者
Corak, Miles [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Inst Study Labor IZA, Bonn, Germany
关键词
EARNINGS; FIRM;
D O I
10.1257/jep.27.3.79
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
My focus is on the degree to which increasing inequality in the high-income countries, particularly in the United States, is likely to limit economic mobility for the next generation of young adults. I discuss the underlying drivers of opportunity that generate the relationship between inequality and intergenerational mobility. The goal is to explain why America differs from other countries, how intergenerational mobility will change in an era of higher inequality, and how the process is different for the top 1 percent. I begin by presenting evidence that countries with more inequality at one point in time also experience less earnings mobility across the generations, a relationship that has been called "The Great Gatsby Curve." The interaction between families, labor markets, and public policies all structure a child's opportunities and determine the extent to which adult earnings are related to family background -- but they do so in different ways across national contexts. Both cross-country comparisons and the underlying trends suggest that these drivers are all configured most likely to lower, or at least not raise, the degree of intergenerational earnings mobility for the next generation of Americans coming of age in a more polarized labor market. This trend will likely continue unless there are changes in public policy that promote the human capital of children in a way that offers relatively greater benefits to the relatively disadvantaged.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 102
页数:24
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
Intergenerational economic mobility in the United States, 1940 to 2000 [J].
Aaronson, Daniel ;
Mazumder, Bhashkar .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2008, 43 (01) :139-172
[2]
More inequality, less social mobility [J].
Andrews, Dan ;
Leigh, Andrew .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2009, 16 (15) :1489-1492
[3]
[Anonymous], PARENTS CHILDREN INT
[4]
[Anonymous], 17218 NBER
[5]
[Anonymous], 2012, 18586 NBER
[6]
[Anonymous], BECKER POSNER BLOG
[7]
[Anonymous], OP POLL EC MOB AM DR
[8]
[Anonymous], GENERATIONAL INCOME
[9]
[Anonymous], RISE CONSEQUENCE INE
[10]
[Anonymous], OXFORD HDB EC INEQUA