Multiple paradigms of nursing science

被引:34
作者
Monti, EJ [1 ]
Tingen, MS
机构
[1] Med Coll Georgia, Nursing Anesthesia Program, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Med Coll Georgia, Sch Nursing, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
empirical methods; interpretative methods; multiple paradigms; nursing science; practice discipline;
D O I
10.1097/00012272-199906000-00010
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 [护理学];
摘要
Of the many controversies that have accompanied the growth of nursing as a discipline, few have been debated as long and as vigorously as the question of which paradigm should guide nursing science. Despite more than 20 years of discussion, the question remains unresolved. This article discusses the concept of paradigm, explores the paradigms that influence nursing science, and presents a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of theoretical unification and mutiparadigmism. Additionally, the implications and consequences of multiparadigmism for the present and future development of nursing as a science within a practice discipline are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 80
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
[Anonymous], WEBSTERS NEW WORLD D
[2]
BOYD CJO, 1993, NURSING RES QUALITAT
[3]
BRAMLETT MH, 1993, VISIONS, V1, P22
[4]
Burns N., 1997, PRACTICE NURSING RES, V3rd
[5]
CARPER BA, 1997, PERSPECTIVES NURSING
[6]
Chinn P.L., 1995, Theory and nursing: A systematic approach, V4th
[7]
Coward D D, 1990, Image J Nurs Sch, V22, P163
[8]
DONALDSON SK, 1997, PERSPECTIVES NURSING
[9]
THE NATURE OF INQUIRY - LINKING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH [J].
DZUREC, LC ;
ABRAHAM, IL .
ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 1993, 16 (01) :73-79
[10]
Fawcett J, 1993, Nurs Sci Q, V6, P56, DOI 10.1177/089431849300600202