Rates of movement and distribution of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster:: in situ hybridization vs Southern blotting data

被引:54
作者
Maside, X
Bartolomé, C
Assimacopoulos, S
Charlesworth, B
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Cell Anim & Populat Biol, Ashworth Labs, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Pharmacol & Physiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0016672301005201
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic copy numbers and the rates of movement of nine families of transposable elements (TEs) of Drosophila melanogaster were estimated in two sets of mutation accumulation lines: Beltsville and Madrid. Southern blotting was used to screen a large number of samples from both genetic backgrounds for TEs. The Madrid lines were, also screened by in situ hybridization of TEs to polytene chromosomes, in order to obtain more detailed information about the behaviour of TEs in the euchromatin. Southern blotting data provided evidence of insertions and excision events in both genetic backgrounds, occurring at rates of approximately 10(-5) and 10(-6) per element copy per generation, respectively. In contrast, in situ data from the Madrid background presented a completely different picture, with no evidence for excisions, and a significantly higher rate of transposition (1-01 x 10(-4)). Direct comparison of the two data sets suggests that the Southern blotting technique had serious deficiencies: (i) it underestimated element abundance; (ii) it revealed less than 30 % of the new insertions detected by in situ hybridization: and (iii) changes in the size of restriction fragments from any source were spuriously identified as simultaneous insertion-excision events. Our in situ data are consistent with previous studies, and suggest that selection is the main force controlling element spread by transposition.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 136
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Adams, MD ;
Celniker, SE ;
Holt, RA ;
Evans, CA ;
Gocayne, JD ;
Amanatides, PG ;
Scherer, SE ;
Li, PW ;
Hoskins, RA ;
Galle, RF ;
George, RA ;
Lewis, SE ;
Richards, S ;
Ashburner, M ;
Henderson, SN ;
Sutton, GG ;
Wortman, JR ;
Yandell, MD ;
Zhang, Q ;
Chen, LX ;
Brandon, RC ;
Rogers, YHC ;
Blazej, RG ;
Champe, M ;
Pfeiffer, BD ;
Wan, KH ;
Doyle, C ;
Baxter, EG ;
Helt, G ;
Nelson, CR ;
Miklos, GLG ;
Abril, JF ;
Agbayani, A ;
An, HJ ;
Andrews-Pfannkoch, C ;
Baldwin, D ;
Ballew, RM ;
Basu, A ;
Baxendale, J ;
Bayraktaroglu, L ;
Beasley, EM ;
Beeson, KY ;
Benos, PV ;
Berman, BP ;
Bhandari, D ;
Bolshakov, S ;
Borkova, D ;
Botchan, MR ;
Bouck, J ;
Brokstein, P .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5461) :2185-2195
[2]  
Andolfatto P, 1999, GENETICS, V153, P1297
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, MOBILE DNA-UK
[4]   GENOME RESHUFFLING OF THE COPIA ELEMENT IN AN INBRED LINE OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
BIEMONT, C ;
AOUAR, A ;
ARNAULT, C .
NATURE, 1987, 329 (6141) :742-744
[5]   POPULATION-DYNAMICS OF THE COPIA, MDG1, MDG3, GYPSY, AND P-TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS IN A NATURAL-POPULATION OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
BIEMONT, C ;
LEMEUNIER, F ;
GUERREIRO, MPG ;
BROOKFIELD, JF ;
GAUTIER, C ;
AULARD, S ;
PASYUKOVA, EG .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1994, 63 (03) :197-212
[6]  
Biemont C, 1997, GENETICS, V147, P1997
[7]   Maintenance of transposable element copy number in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D-simulans [J].
Biémont, C ;
Vieira, C ;
Hoogland, C ;
Cizeron, G ;
Loevenbruck, C ;
Arnault, C ;
Carante, JP .
GENETICA, 1997, 100 (1-3) :161-166
[8]   Distribution of transposable elements in Drosophila species [J].
Biémont, C ;
Cizeron, G .
GENETICA, 1999, 105 (01) :43-62
[9]  
Bingham PM, 1989, MOBILE DNA, P485