Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree

被引:127
作者
Taylor, ACF [1 ]
Little, AF [1 ]
Hennessy, OF [1 ]
Banting, SW [1 ]
Smith, PJ [1 ]
Desmond, PV [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Melbourne, Vic 3065, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2002.120324
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditionally, ERCP has been the only reliable method for imaging the billary tree, but it is invasive and carries a risk of complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) Is a noninvasive method for imaging the biliary tree. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of MRCP in a large number of patients. Methods: Consecutive patients referred to a teaching hospital for ERCP were eligible for study entry. MRCP was performed within 24 hours before ERCP. MRCP findings were compared with ERCP findings or, when the initial ERCP was unsuccessful, with results of repeat ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, or surgery. Results: One hundred forty-six patients underwent 149 ERCP/MRCP procedures, of which 129 were evaluable with successful MRCP and ERCP or an ERCP-equivalent study. Diagnoses included choledocholithiasis In 46 and biliary stricture in 12 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were 97.9%, 89.0%, 83.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. All 12 strictures were diagnosed by MRCP (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.1%). Conclusions: MRCP is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to ERCP for imaging the biliary tree. Choiedocholithiasis and biliary strictures can be reliably diagnosed or excluded by MRCP. MRCP should be used Increasingly in patients with suspected billary obstruction to select those who require a therapeutic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 22
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction [J].
Adamek, HE ;
Albert, J ;
Weitz, M ;
Breer, H ;
Schilling, D ;
Riemann, JF .
GUT, 1998, 43 (05) :680-683
[2]  
Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
[3]  
Asselah T, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P109
[4]   Pancreas divisum: Evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography [J].
Bret, PM ;
Reinhold, C ;
Taourel, P ;
Guibaud, L ;
Atri, M ;
Barkun, AN .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (01) :99-103
[5]   Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis [J].
Canto, MIF ;
Chak, A ;
Stellato, T ;
Sivak, MV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (06) :439-448
[6]   Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [J].
Chan, YL ;
Chan, ACW ;
Lam, WWM ;
Lee, DWH ;
Chung, SSC ;
Sung, JJY ;
Cheung, HS ;
Li, AKC ;
Metreweli, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) :85-89
[7]   Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis:: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography?: A prospective controlled study [J].
de Lédinghen, V ;
Lecesne, R ;
Raymond, JM ;
Gense, V ;
Amouretti, M ;
Drouillard, J ;
Couzigou, P ;
Silvain, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (01) :26-31
[8]   Sclerosing cholangitis in adults with cystic fibrosis: a magnetic resonance cholangiographic prospective study [J].
Durieu, I ;
Pellet, O ;
Simonot, L ;
Durupt, S ;
Bellon, G ;
Durand, DV ;
Minh, VAT .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 30 (06) :1052-1056
[9]   Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [J].
Fleischmann, D ;
Ringl, H ;
Schofl, R ;
Potzi, R ;
Kontrus, M ;
Henk, C ;
Bankier, AA ;
Kettenbach, J ;
Mostbeck, GH .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (03) :861-868
[10]  
Franklin KJ, 1999, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V116, pA9