Discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy

Discursive ethics has its origin in the Frankfurt School of critical theory, As an applied ethic it is also associated with practical philosophy, In this paper discursive ethics is discussed as a conceptual and practical framework for ecosystems valuation and environmental policy, The discussion focuses on three main strengths of discursive ethics: (1) it offers an integrated process for ecosystems valuation; (2) it offers a decision-making framework for responding to uncertainty and risk and the reality of action-in-indeterminacy; (3) it offers a process for deconstructing common valuation concepts and identifying conditions for their critical reconstruction. The theoretical discussion is followed by a case study example which illustrates the usefulness of discursive ethics in identifying valuation biases hidden behind disciplinary assumptions and conceptual norms, These include cultural norms of rationality, information biases which consider ''hard facts'' over ''soft values'', and disciplinary valuation biases which distinguish between ''hard'' and ''soft'' expert contributions, As the case study illustrates, a successful application of discursive ethics in ecosystems valuation and environmental policy demands sensitivity to such underlying biases. Beyond its policy relevance discursive ethics may also offer a framework for an extended peer discourse through which new foci in research and education can be identified.