Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives

被引：137

作者：

de Bruin, K. ^{[1
]}

Dellink, R. B. ^{[1
]}

Ruijs, A. ^{[1
]}

Bolwidt, L. ^{[2
]}

van Buuren, A. ^{[3
]}

Graveland, J. ^{[4
]}

de Groot, R. S. ^{[5
]}

Kuikman, P. J. ^{[6
]}

Reinhard, S. ^{[7
,8
]}

Roetter, R. P. ^{[6
]}

Tassone, V. C. ^{[5
]}

Verhagen, A. ^{[9
]}

van Ierland, E. C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Wageningen Univ, Environm Econ & Nat Resources Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands

[2] Inst Inland Water Management & Waste Water Treatm, RIZA, Lelystad, Netherlands

[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Rotterdam, Netherlands

[4] Natl Inst Coastal & Marine Management, RIKZ, Middelburg, Netherlands

[5] Wageningen UR, Environm Syst Anal, Wageningen, Netherlands

[6] Wageningen UR, Alterra, Wageningen, Netherlands

[7] Wageningen UR, LEI, Wageningen, Netherlands

[8] BSIK Leven Met Water, Gouda, Netherlands

[9] Wageningen UR, Plant Res Int, Wageningen, Netherlands

来源：

CLIMATIC CHANGE | 2009年 / 95卷 / 1-2期

关键词：

MULTICRITERIA; POLICIES;

D O I：

10.1007/s10584-009-9576-4

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

In many countries around the world impacts of climate change are assessed and adaptation options identified. We describe an approach for a qualitative and quantitative assessment of adaptation options to respond to climate change in the Netherlands. The study introduces an inventory and ranking of adaptation options based on stakeholder analysis and expert judgement, and presents some estimates of incremental costs and benefits. The qualitative assessment focuses on ranking and prioritisation of adaptation options. Options are selected and identified and discussed by stakeholders on the basis of a sectoral approach, and assessed with respect to their importance, urgency and other characteristics by experts. The preliminary quantitative assessment identifies incremental costs and benefits of adaptation options. Priority ranking based on a weighted sum of criteria reveals that in the Netherlands integrated nature and water management and risk based policies rank high, followed by policies aiming at 'climate proof' housing and infrastructure.

引用

页码：23 / 45

页数：23

共 37 条

[1]

Abramovitz Janet., 2002, Adapting to Climate Change

[2]

[Anonymous], 2006, CLIM 21 CENT 4 SCEN

[3]

[Anonymous], 2005, Finland's national strategy for adaptation to climate change, P281

[4]

[Anonymous], 2005, ADAPTATION POLICY FR

[5]

Bell M.L., 2001, J MULT CRITERIA DECI, P229, DOI [10.1002/mcda.305, DOI 10.1002/MCDA.305]

[6]

Belton Valerie., 2002, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4]

[7] Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands [J].

Brouwer, R ;

van Ek, R .

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 50 (1-2) :1-21

[8] From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy [J].

Burton, I ;

Huq, S ;

Lim, B ;

Pilifosova, O ;

Schipper, EL .

CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (2-3) :145-159

[9]

*CLIM CHANG SPAT P, 2008, NAT RES PROGR CLIM C

[10]

*DEFRA, 2006, UK 4 NAT COMM UN NAT, P135

← 1 2 3 4 →