Understanding measurements of intestinal permeability in healthy humans with urine lactulose and mannitol excretion

被引:110
作者
Camilleri, M. [1 ]
Nadeau, A. [1 ]
Lamsam, J. [3 ]
Nord, S. Linker [1 ]
Ryks, M. [1 ]
Burton, D. [1 ]
Sweetser, S. [1 ]
Zinsmeister, A. R. [2 ]
Singh, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, CENTER Grp, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Immunochem Core Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
barrier; inflammation; irritable bowel; lactulose:mannitol ratio; IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; AUTOMATED ENZYMATIC ASSAYS; HUMAN COLON; MACROMOLECULAR PERMEABILITY; BARRIER FUNCTION; IN-VITRO; INFLAMMATION; BIOPSIES; DISEASE; TRANSIT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01361.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
P>Our aim was to understand the information from differential two-sugar excretion (2-SE) in measuring intestinal permeability. In a crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers, we compared urinary excretion ratios of lactulose (L) to mannitol [(M) LMR] after ingestion in liquid formulation (LF) or in delayed-release, methacrylate-coated capsules (CAP). Both formulations were radiolabelled. Urine was collected every 2 h from 0 to 8 h, and from 8 to 24 h. Two hours after LF, gastric residual was 15.9 +/- 6.2% (SEM), and the percentage in colon was 49.6 +/- 7.8%; in 11/12 participants, liquid had entered colon within 2 h. Average CAP arrival time in colon was 5.16 +/- 0.46 h (mode 6 h). After LF, mannitol was extensively absorbed in the first 8 h; lactulose absorption was low thoughout the 24 h. After the LF, the LMR (geometric mean, 95% CI per h) in the 0-2 h urine was [0.08 (0.05, 0.11)], which was lower than in 8-24 h urine [0.32 (0.16, 0.46); P < 0.05]. Urine LMRs at 8-24 h were similar after LF or CAP. We concluded that, after LF, sugar excretion in 0-2 h urine may reflect both SI and colon permeability. Colonic permeability is reflected by urine sugar excretion between 6 and 24 h. CAP delivery reduces mannitol excreted at 0-6 h, compared with LF. The 0-5 or 6 h 2-SE urine likely reflects both SI and colon permeability; the higher LMR in the 8-24 h urine relative to 0-2 h urine should be interpreted with caution and does not mean that colon is more permeable than SI.
引用
收藏
页码:E15 / E26
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A SIMPLE ENZYMATIC METHOD FOR THE ASSAY OF URINARY LACTULOSE [J].
BEHRENS, RH ;
DOCHERTY, H ;
ELIA, M ;
NEALE, G .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1984, 137 (03) :361-367
[2]  
BJARNASON I, 1983, LANCET, V1, P323
[3]  
BJARNASON I, 1983, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V85, P318
[4]   INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY - AN OVERVIEW [J].
BJARNASON, I ;
MACPHERSON, A ;
HOLLANDER, D .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (05) :1566-1581
[5]   Effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on gastric emptying and small intestinal transit in humans [J].
Bouras, EP ;
Burton, DD ;
Camilleri, M ;
Stephens, DA ;
Thomforde, GM .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2004, 16 (06) :729-735
[6]   Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation increases transcellular transport of macromolecules across mouse and human intestinal epithelium in vitro [J].
Cameron, H. L. ;
Perdue, M. H. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2007, 19 (01) :47-56
[7]   IMPAIRED TRANSIT OF CHYME IN CHRONIC INTESTINAL PSEUDOOBSTRUCTION - CORRECTION BY CISAPRIDE [J].
CAMILLERI, M ;
BROWN, ML ;
MALAGELADA, JR .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 91 (03) :619-626
[8]   Intestinal permeability and irritable bowel syndrome [J].
Camilleri, M. ;
Gorman, H. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2007, 19 (07) :545-552
[9]   Abnormal intestinal permeability in subgroups of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndromes [J].
Dunlop, Simon P. ;
Hebden, John ;
Campbell, Eugene ;
Naesdal, Jorgen ;
Olbe, Lars ;
Perkins, Alan C. ;
Spiller, Robin C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (06) :1288-1294
[10]   SIMULTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF LACTULOSE AND CR-51 ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID - A TEST TO DISTINGUISH COLONIC FROM SMALL-INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY CHANGE [J].
JENKINS, AP ;
NUKAJAM, WS ;
MENZIES, IS ;
CREAMER, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) :769-773