Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems

被引:57
作者
Skorek-Osikowska, Anna [1 ]
Janusz-Szymanska, Katarzyna [1 ]
Kotowicz, Janusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Tech Univ, Inst Power Engn & Turbomachinery, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
Numerical modeling; CO2; capture; Membrane separation; Chemical absorption; IGCC; CO2; CAPTURE; POWER-PLANT; GAS SEPARATION; COST-ANALYSIS; FLUE-GAS; MEMBRANE; INTEGRATION; PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.002
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Carbon dioxide capture from energy systems will likely become a necessity as the European Union regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent. The greatest disadvantage of the existing methods of CO2 separation is the high energy intensity. In the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) system, the carbon dioxide capture process is conducted before combustion, which facilitates the separation. In this paper, two methods of CO2 capture are compared. The first is the most frequently considered, known as chemical absorption. The second is membrane CO2 separation, which is not as commonly deployed but has the potential to be an even more efficient process. The models of CO2 capture installations were built in Aspen software. The two processes used in the analyses were primarily compared with respect to the energy intensity of each method. The results of the analysis show that the use of membranes allows for a significant decrease in the energy intensity of the capture process compared with the absorption process. However, the purity of the separated CO2 significantly depends on the type and surface of the membrane and on the process parameters. Nevertheless, it is clear that the development of membrane techniques will enable the most competitive CO2 capture solutions, in terms of effectiveness and cost, compared with other methods. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 100
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   CO2 capture from power plants.: Part I.: A parametric study of the technical-performance based on monoethanolamine [J].
Abu-Zahra, Mohammad R. M. ;
Schneiders, Leon H. J. ;
Niederer, John P. M. ;
Feron, Paul H. M. ;
Versteeg, Geert F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (01) :37-46
[2]   Simulation of CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing:: a flowsheet decomposition method [J].
Alie, C ;
Backham, L ;
Croiset, E ;
Douglas, PL .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 46 (03) :475-487
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CO2 CAPT FLUE GAS GL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, METPORE NAN CER MET
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EN GERM VER CO2 REC
[6]  
[Anonymous], ASP PLUS VERS V7 1
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V140/63
[8]   Membrane Gas Separation: A Review/State of the Art [J].
Bernardo, P. ;
Drioli, E. ;
Golemme, G. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2009, 48 (10) :4638-4663
[9]  
Bodzek M., 1997, MEMBRANES TECHNOLOGI
[10]  
Bounaceur R, 2006, ENERGY, V31, P2556, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.038