Establishing objective detection limits for the pepsin digestion assay used in the assessment of genetically modified foods

被引:41
作者
Ofori-Anti, A. O. [1 ]
Ariyarathna, H. [1 ]
Chen, L. [1 ]
Lee, H. L. [1 ]
Pramod, S. N. [1 ]
Goodman, R. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Food Sci & Technol, FARRP, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
Genetically modified; Pepsin digestion; Simulated gastric fluid; Food allergy; Allergenicity;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.06.006
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Rationale: Guidelines for assessing the potential allergenicity of genetically modified (GM) organisms recommend testing the digestibility of the introduced protein by pepsin. Previous studies detailed the digestion procedure but have not described a simple objective measurement of the extent of digestion nor evaluated the impact of variation in pepsin activity. Methods: Samples of eight proteins were digested by pepsin at pH 1.2 and 2.0 using standard conditions (10,000 U of pepsin activity per mg test protein) as well as 5000 and 20,000 units per mg of test protein. An independent digestion assay of hemoglobin was used to verify pepsin activity for each assay. Digestion was stopped in timed samples between 0.5 and 60 min. Digestion samples and undigested protein (10% and 100%) were separated by SDS-PAGE. Residual stained protein bands were measured by image analysis. Results: The differences in pH and pepsin concentration only had minor effects on digestion of intermediately stable proteins: concanavalin A, ovalbumin, and lysozyme, but not on rapidly digested or stable proteins. Conclusions: Verification of pepsin activity and measurement of an objective endpoint of digestion (e.g. (90%) should provide more comparable results for the safety assessment of novel food proteins. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain, and cathepsin with hemoglobin [J].
Anson, ML .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1938, 22 (01) :79-89
[2]   Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro [J].
Astwood, JD ;
Leach, JN ;
Fuchs, RL .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 14 (10) :1269-1273
[3]  
Bannon G, 2003, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V111, P1122
[4]  
BOHAK Z, 1969, J BIOL CHEM, V244, P4638
[5]   Kinetic study of the appearance of an anti-bacterial peptide in the course of bovine haemoglobin peptic hydrolysis [J].
Choisnard, L ;
Froidevaux, R ;
Nedjar-Arroume, N ;
Lignot, B ;
Vercaigne-Marko, D ;
Krier, F ;
Dhulster, P ;
Guillochon, D .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 36 :187-194
[6]  
FAO/WHO, 2001, Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology
[7]  
FEHLNER PF, 1991, J IMMUNOL, V146, P2664
[8]   Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid - A comparative study [J].
Fu, TT ;
Abbott, UR ;
Hatzos, C .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2002, 50 (24) :7154-7160
[9]  
GHOSH B, 1994, J IMMUNOL, V152, P2882
[10]   Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: A review [J].
Goodman, RE ;
Hefle, SL ;
Taylor, SL ;
van Ree, R .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 137 (02) :153-166