Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients - Results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital

被引:46
作者
Quinlivan, JA [1 ]
Petersen, RW [1 ]
Nichols, CN [1 ]
机构
[1] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03375.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In response to a Western Australian Ministerial enquiry into the levels of intervention in childbirth, a 2-year prospective audit was undertaken of the indication and timing of all public Caesarean section deliveries at King Edward Memorial hospital. During the study period, a total of 9,138 deliveries were pet-formed at the hospital, of which 1,624 wen by Caesarean section, an overall rate of 17.8%. Of these, 633 (39%) were elective and 911 (61%) were nonelective. The most common primary indication for elective Caesarean section was maternal choice, largely due to a refusal of the patient to consent to a trial of scar following a single previous Caesarean section or a refusal to attempt a trial of vaginal breech delivery. The most common indications for nonelective Caesarean section birth were an intrapartum diagnosis of suspected fetal distress or failure to progress in labour. Strategies to reduce the incidence of Caesarean section birth need to focus on the pathways involved with maternal decision-making in the birth process, and on improving the diagnosis of intrapartum fetal compromise.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :544-544
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1994, 143 AM COLL OBST GYN
[3]  
*DEP HLTH CHANG CH, 1993, REP EXP MAT GROUP
[4]   VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
FLAMM, BL ;
LIM, OW ;
JONES, C ;
FALLON, D ;
NEWMAN, LA ;
MANTIS, JK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (05) :1079-1084
[5]  
GEE V, 1996, 13 HLTH DEP WA
[6]  
Jackson Nikki V., 1998, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Abingdon), V18, P115
[7]   VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - THE IMPACT OF PATIENT RESISTANCE TO A TRIAL OF LABOR [J].
JOSEPH, GF ;
STEDMAN, CM ;
ROBICHAUX, AG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 164 (06) :1441-1447
[8]   THE RELATIVE RISKS OF CESAREAN-SECTION (INTRAPARTUM AND ELECTIVE) AND VAGINAL DELIVERY - A DETAILED ANALYSIS TO EXCLUDE THE EFFECTS OF MEDICAL DISORDERS AND OTHER ACUTE PREEXISTING PHYSIOLOGICAL DISTURBANCES [J].
LILFORD, RJ ;
DEGROOT, HAV ;
MOORE, PJ ;
BINGHAM, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (10) :883-892
[9]  
Paterson-Brown S, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P462
[10]  
ROBERTS CL, 1987, 2 ANN PER SOC AUST N, V2, pA74