Estimation of direct causal effects

被引:250
作者
Petersen, ML [1 ]
Sinisi, SE [1 ]
van der Laan, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ede.0000208475.99429.2d
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many common problems in epidemiologic and clinical research involve estimating the effect of an exposure on an outcome while blocking the exposure's effect on an intermediate variable. Effects of this kind are termed direct effects. Estimation of direct effects is typically the goal of research aimed at understanding mechanistic pathways by which an exposure acts to cause or prevent disease, as well as in many other settings. Although multivariable regression is commonly used to estimate direct effects, this approach requires assumptions beyond those required for the estimation of total causal effects. In addition, when the exposure and intermediate variables interact to cause disease, multivariable regression estimates a particular type of direct effect-the effect of an exposure on an outcome when the intermediate is fixed at a specified level. Using the counterfactual framework, we distinguish this definition of a direct effect (controlled direct effect) from an alternative definition, in which the effect of the exposure on the intermediate is blocked, but the inter-mediate is otherwise allowed to vary as it would in the absence of exposure (natural direct effect). We illustrate the difference between controlled and natural direct effects using several examples. We present an estimation approach for natural direct effects that can be implemented using standard statistical software, and we review the assumptions underlying our approach (which are less restrictive than those proposed by previous authors).
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Fallibility in estimating direct effects [J].
Cole, SR ;
Hernán, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :163-165
[2]   Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research [J].
Greenland, S ;
Pearl, J ;
Robins, JM .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (01) :37-48
[3]  
Joffe MM, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2233, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2233::AID-SIM922>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-0
[5]   Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables [J].
Kaufman, S ;
Kaufman, JS ;
MacLehose, RF ;
Greenland, S ;
Poole, C .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (11) :1683-1702
[6]   Mechanism of HIV-1 viral protein R-induced apoptosis [J].
Muthumani, K ;
Choo, AY ;
Hwang, DS ;
Chattergoon, MA ;
Dayes, NN ;
Zhang, DH ;
Lee, MD ;
Duvvuri, U ;
Weiner, DB .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2003, 304 (03) :583-592
[7]  
Pearl J., 2001, P 17 C UNCERTAINTY A, P411, DOI DOI 10.5555/2074022.2074073
[8]   Decreased HIV-associated T cell apoptosis by HIV protease inhibitors [J].
Phenix, BN ;
Angel, JB ;
Mandy, F ;
Kravcik, S ;
Parato, K ;
Chambers, KA ;
Gallicano, K ;
Hawley-Foss, N ;
Cassol, S ;
Cameron, DW ;
Badley, AD .
AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2000, 16 (06) :559-567
[9]  
Poole C, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, pS52
[10]  
Robins J.M., 2003, Oxford Statistical Science Series, P70