The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T

被引:90
作者
Wen, H
Denison, TJ
Singerman, RW
Balaban, RS
机构
[1] Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, Natl. Heart, Lung and Blood Inst., National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
[2] Research Laboratory for Electronics, MIT, Cambridge
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jmre.1996.1072
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cardiac imaging is inherently demanding on the signal-to-noise performance of the MR scanner and may benefit from high field strengths. However, the complex behavior of the radiofrequency field in the human body at high frequencies makes model-based analyses difficult. This study aims to obtain reliable comparisons of the signal-to-noise profile in the human chest in vivo at 1.5, 3, and 4 T. By using an RF-field-mapping method, it is shown that the intrinsic signal-to-noise increases with the field strength up to 4 T with a less than linear relation. The RF held profile is markedly distorted at 4 T, and the onset of this distortion is dependent on the body size. The high power deposition and the consequences of the RF field distortion are discussed. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Barfuss H, 1990, NMR Biomed, V3, P31, DOI 10.1002/nbm.1940030106
[2]  
Bomsdorf H, 1988, NMR Biomed, V1, P151, DOI 10.1002/nbm.1940010308
[3]   COMPARISON OF P-31 MRS AND H-1 MRI AT 1.5-T AND 2.0-T [J].
BOSKA, MD ;
HUBESCH, B ;
MEYERHOFF, DJ ;
TWIEG, DB ;
KARCZMAR, GS ;
MATSON, GB ;
WEINER, MW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 13 (02) :228-238
[4]   RF MAGNETIC-FIELD PENETRATION, PHASE-SHIFT AND POWER DISSIPATION IN BIOLOGICAL TISSUE - IMPLICATIONS FOR NMR IMAGING [J].
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
ANDREW, ER .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1978, 23 (04) :630-643
[5]   POWER DEPOSITION IN WHOLE-BODY NMR IMAGING [J].
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
EDELSTEIN, WA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (04) :510-512
[6]   THE FIELD-DEPENDENCE OF NMR IMAGING .1. LABORATORY ASSESSMENT OF SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO AND POWER DEPOSITION [J].
CHEN, CN ;
SANK, VJ ;
COHEN, SM ;
HOULT, DI .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1986, 3 (05) :722-729
[7]   MUSCULOSKELETAL MR-IMAGING AT 4 T AND AT 1.5 T - COMPARISON OF RELAXATION-TIMES AND IMAGE-CONTRAST [J].
DUEWELL, SH ;
CECKLER, TL ;
ONG, K ;
WEN, H ;
JAFFER, FA ;
CHESNICK, SA ;
BALABAN, RS .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) :551-555
[8]   THE INTRINSIC SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN NMR IMAGING [J].
EDELSTEIN, WA ;
GLOVER, GH ;
HARDY, CJ ;
REDINGTON, RW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1986, 3 (04) :604-618
[9]   AN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR THE DESIGN OF RF RESONATORS FOR MR BODY IMAGING [J].
FOO, TKF ;
HAYES, CE ;
KANG, YW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 21 (02) :165-177
[10]   COMPARISON OF LINEAR AND CIRCULAR-POLARIZATION FOR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
GLOVER, GH ;
HAYES, CE ;
PELC, NJ ;
EDELSTEIN, WA ;
MUELLER, OM ;
HART, HR ;
HARDY, CJ ;
ODONNELL, M ;
BARBER, WD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1985, 64 (02) :255-270