Early versus late prenatal care in New Mexico: Barriers and motivators

被引:21
作者
Rogers, C
Schiff, M
机构
[1] UNIV NEW MEXICO, HLTH SCI CTR, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87131 USA
[2] ST PAUL RAMSEY MED CTR, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL, ST PAUL, MN 55101 USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 1996年 / 23卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00457.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Adequate prenatal care is important for ensuring a good outcome for pregnant women and their children, and its initiation in the first trimester is a major component. We investigated barriers and motivators for women receiving early versus late prenatal care. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 205 women who began prenatal care at the University of New Mexico Hospital Obstetrics Clinic in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The questionnaire assessed demographic information, insurance status, feelings about the pregnancy, health behaviors, and barriers and motivators to initiating prenatal care. The participants were Hispanic (41%) and non-Hispanic white (46%), low-income women with Medicaid (42%) or no health insurance (41%). They were divided into early (1st trimester 67%) and late (after 1st trimester 33%) care groups. Results: Ethnicity, education, income, and age did not predict initiation of prenatal care. Late initiators cited financial problems (26%), not being aware of the pregnancy (15%), and dislike of going to doctors (14%) as reasons for the delay in seeking prenatal care. Over two-thirds of the pregnancies were unplanned, but 82 percent of the women felt positive about the pregnancy. Conclusions: Our study documents the continuing need for public health efforts to encourage women to seek early prenatal care. Specific attention should be directed toward women's perceived reasons for not initiating early care.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 30
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AVED BM, 1993, WESTERN J MED, V158, P493
[2]  
BLANKENSHIP CW, 1992, BETTER START BETTER, P22
[3]   A COMPARISON OF PRENATAL-CARE USE IN THE UNITED-STATES AND EUROPE [J].
BUEKENS, P ;
KOTELCHUCK, M ;
BLONDEL, B ;
KRISTENSEN, FB ;
CHEN, JH ;
MASUYSTROOBANT, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :31-36
[4]  
Clarke L L, 1993, J Health Care Poor Underserved, V4, P117
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF VARIATIONS IN AFDC AND MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY ON PRENATAL-CARE USE [J].
COBURN, AF ;
MCDONALD, TP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1992, 35 (08) :1055-1063
[6]   HEALTH-STATUS AND TIMING OF ONSET OF PRENATAL-CARE - IS THERE AN ASSOCIATION AMONG LOW-INCOME WOMEN [J].
ENDERLEIN, MC ;
STEPHENSON, PA ;
HOLT, VL ;
HICKOK, D .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1994, 21 (02) :71-76
[7]   DOES PRENATAL-CARE IMPROVE BIRTH OUTCOMES - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
FISCELLA, K .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (03) :468-479
[8]  
Giblin P T, 1990, J Community Health, V15, P357, DOI 10.1007/BF01324298
[9]   SELF-ESTEEM, SOCIAL SUPPORT, AND SATISFACTION DIFFERENCES IN WOMEN WITH ADEQUATE AND INADEQUATE PRENATAL-CARE [J].
HIGGINS, P ;
MURRAY, ML ;
WILLIAMS, EM .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1994, 21 (01) :26-33
[10]   BARRIERS AND MOTIVATORS TO PRENATAL-CARE AMONG LOW-INCOME WOMEN [J].
HOAGBERG, BL ;
RODE, P ;
SKOVHOLT, CJ ;
OBERG, CN ;
BERG, C ;
MULLETT, S ;
CHOI, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1990, 30 (04) :487-495