Colonic perforation at CT colonography: Assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort

被引:98
作者
Sosna, J
Blachar, A
Amitai, M
Barmeir, E
Peled, N
Goldberg, SN
Ziv, JB
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Tel Aviv Med Ctr & Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Bnei Zion Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Haifa, Israel
[6] Carmel Hosp, Dept Radiol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2392050287
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess retrospectively the incidence, clinical features, and treatment of colonic perforation at computed tomographic (CT) colonography in a large multicenter cohort. Materials and Methods: The study was performed in accordance with the institutional ethics committees' requirements of a retrospective review in each of the participating centers, and no informed consent was required. A review of all patients who underwent CT colonography between January 2001 and December 2004 in 11 medical centers representing more than 95% of studies performed in a single country was performed to determine the rate of colorectal perforation. Data about patient demographics and patient- and procedure-related risk were recorded. Information about the location of the perforation, its likely mechanism, and treatment was collected. Analysis included calculation of rates of colonic perforation and surgical treatment and of 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 11 870 CT colonographic studies were performed in 6837 (57.6%) men and 5033 (42.4%) women (mean age, 59.9 years; range, 38-90 years) with seven cases of colorectal perforation, yielding a risk rate of 0.059% (one of 1696 studies; 95% confidence interval: one of 974, 971 of 6537). The mean age of the patients with perforation was 77.8 years. Six (84%) of seven cases of perforation occurred in symptomatic patients at high risk for colorectal neoplasia, and one (16%) occurred in an asymptomatic average-risk patient. All studies were performed after insufflation of room air. Six (84%) cases of perforation occurred in patients in whom a rectal tube was inserted, and in five of them, a balloon was inflated. Five (71%) cases of perforation occurred in the sigmoid colon; and two (29%), in the rectum. Four (57%) patients (one in 2968 patients; 95% confidence interval: 1.5 in 10 000, 14.7 in 10 000) required surgical treatment. Possible factors that contributed to perforation were left inguinal hernia containing colon (n = 4), severe diverticulosis (n = 3), and obstructive carcinoma (n = 1). Conclusion: Perforation of the colon and rectum is a rare complication of CT colonography. Older age and underlying concomitant colonic disease were present in patients with perforation.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 463
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Endoscopic perforation of the colon: Lessons from a 10-year study
    Anderson, ML
    Pasha, TM
    Leighton, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (12) : 3418 - 3422
  • [2] Complications of barium enema examinations: A survey of UK consultant radiologists 1992 to 1994
    Blakeborough, A
    Sheridan, MB
    Chapman, AH
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (02) : 142 - 148
  • [3] Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy
    Bretthauer, M
    Hoff, GS
    Thiis-Evensen, E
    Huppertz-Hauss, G
    Skovlund, E
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (02) : 203 - 206
  • [4] Perforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: Report of a case
    Coady-Fariborzian, L
    Angel, LP
    Procaccino, JA
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (07) : 1247 - 1249
  • [5] Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia
    Cotton, PB
    Durkalski, VL
    Benoit, PC
    Palesch, YY
    Mauldin, PD
    Hoffman, B
    Vining, DJ
    Small, WC
    Affronti, J
    Rex, D
    Kopecky, KK
    Ackerman, S
    Burdick, JS
    Brewington, C
    Turner, MA
    Zfass, A
    Wright, AR
    Iyer, RB
    Lynch, P
    Sivak, MV
    Butler, H
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1713 - 1719
  • [6] IS THERE A SAFE INTERVAL BETWEEN DIAGNOSTIC INVASIVE PROCEDURE AND THE BARIUM ENEMA STUDY OF THE COLORECTUM
    CULP, CE
    CARLSON, HC
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1984, 9 (01): : 69 - 72
  • [7] Complications of diagnostic within a defined population and therapeutic colonoscopy in Sweden
    Dafnis, G
    Ekbom, A
    Pahlman, L
    Blomqvist, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (03) : 302 - 309
  • [8] Colonoscopic perforations - Etiology, diagnosis, and management
    Damore, LJ
    Rantis, PC
    Vernava, AM
    Longo, WE
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (11) : 1308 - 1314
  • [9] Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: Sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants
    De Zwart, IM
    Griffioen, G
    Shaw, MPC
    Lamers, CBHW
    De Roos, A
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (05) : 401 - 409
  • [10] Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation
    Eckardt, VF
    Kanzler, G
    Schmitt, T
    Eckardt, AJ
    Bernhard, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (05) : 560 - 565