Vicissitudes of a misnomer: Reply to Dalgleish (2005)

被引:8
作者
Chajut, E
Lev, S
Algom, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Psychol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Open Univ, Dept Psychol, Raanana, Israel
关键词
conflict words; threat words; attention; emotion;
D O I
10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.592
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Stroop effect is psycholo.-y's classic measure gauging the selectivity of attention to individual attributes of complex stimuli. The emotional Stroop effect gauges the influence on behavior of threat and emotional stimuli. The former taps central/executive processes abstracted from particular stimulus contexts, whereas the latter taps automatic processes inextricably linked to particular stimuli in the environment. T. Dalgleish (2005) raised concerns about the data and theory that support the separateness of the 2 effects (D. Algom, E. Chajut, & S. Lev, 2004). The present reply shows that Dalgleish's objections are unwarranted and that the term emotional Stroop effect blurs the deep conceptual divide separating the 2 phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 595
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条