An Investigation Into the Magnitude of the Current Window and Perception of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Sensation at Various Frequencies and Body Sites in Healthy Human Participants

被引:15
作者
Hughes, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
Bennett, Michael I. [3 ,4 ]
Johnson, Mark I. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[2] St James Univ Hosp, St Jamess Inst Oncol, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Leeds Pallium Res Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS); pain measurement; sensory detection threshold; pain threshold; hypoalgesia; nontherapeutic human experimentation; PRESSURE PAIN; PARAMETER MANIPULATION; THRESHOLD; INTENSITY; METAANALYSIS; HYPOALGESIA; AFFERENTS; PROTOCOL; MUSCLE; RATS;
D O I
10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182579919
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: Strong nonpainful transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is prerequisite to a successful analgesic outcome although the ease with which this sensation is achieved is likely to depend on the magnitude of current amplitude (mA) between sensory detection threshold (SDT) and pain threshold, that is, the current window. Objectives: To measure the current window and participant's perception of the comfort of the TENS sensation at different body sites. Methods: A repeated measure cross-over study was conducted using 30 healthy adult volunteers. Current amplitudes (mA) of TENS [2 pulses per second (pps); 30 pps; 80 pps] at SDT, pain threshold, and strong nonpainful intensities were measured at the tibia (bone), knee joint (connective tissue), lower back [paraspinal (skeletal) muscle], volar surface of forearm (nerve) and waist (fat). The amplitude to achieve a strong nonpainful intensity was represented as a percentage of the current window. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Effects were detected for body site and frequency for SDT (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, respectively), current window (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively), and strong nonpainful TENS as a percentage of the current window (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, respectively). The current window was larger for the knee joint compared with tibia (difference [95% confidence interval] = 12.76mA [4.25, 21.28]; P = 0.001) and forearm (10.33mA [2.62, 18.40]; P = 0.006), and for the lower back compared with tibia (12.10mA [1.65, 22.52]; P = 0.015) and forearm (9.65mA [1.06, 18.24]; P = 0.019). The current window was larger for 2 pps compared with 30 pps (P < 0.001) and 80 pps (P < 0.001). Participants rated strong nonpainful TENS as most comfortable at the lower back (P < 0.001) and least comfortable at the tibia and forearm (P < 0.001). Conclusions: TENS is most comfortable and easiest to titrate to a strong nonpainful intensity when applied over areas of muscle and soft tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 153
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebocontrolled trial in healthy subjects [J].
Aarskog, Reidar ;
Johnson, Mark I. ;
Demmink, Jan Hendrik ;
Lofthus, Anne ;
Iversen, Vegard ;
Lopes-Martins, Rodrigo ;
Joensen, Jon ;
Bjordal, Jan M. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 12 (04) :251-263
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]   Methodological quality in randomised controlled trials of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for pain: Low fidelity may explain negative findings [J].
Bennett, Michael I. ;
Hughes, Nicola ;
Johnson, Mark I. .
PAIN, 2011, 152 (06) :1226-1232
[4]   Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain [J].
Bjordal, JM ;
Johnson, MI ;
Ljunggreen, AE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2003, 7 (02) :181-188
[5]   An investigation into the effect of electrode placement of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on experimentally induced ischemic pain in healthy human participants [J].
Brown, Lesley ;
Tabasam, Ghazala ;
Bjordal, Jan M. ;
Johnson, Mark I. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 23 (09) :735-743
[6]   ON THE USE OF A PILOT SAMPLE FOR SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION [J].
BROWNE, RH .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (17) :1933-1940
[7]  
Chakour MC, 2000, PROG PAIN RES MANAG, V16, P987
[8]  
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, 2006, GUID CLIN US EL AG
[9]   INFLUENCE OF CHOICE OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SITE ON PERIPHERAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HYPOALGESIC EFFECTS [J].
Cheing, Gladys L. Y. ;
Chan, Winnie W. Y. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (06) :412-417
[10]   Does the pulse frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) influence hypoalgesia? A systematic review of studies using experimental pain and healthy human participants [J].
Chen, Chih-Chung ;
Tabasarn, Ghazala ;
Johnson, Mark I. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2008, 94 (01) :11-20