Trends in US sex ratio by plurality, gestational age and race/ethnicity

被引:12
作者
Branum, Amy M. [1 ]
Parker, Jennifer D.
Schoendorf, Kenneth C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Infant Child & Womens Hlth Stat Branch, Off Anal & Epidemiol, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
关键词
sex ratio; statistics; epidemiology; USA; ethnicity; UNITED-STATES; INFANT-MORTALITY; BIRTH; INDUCTION; OVULATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dep255
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The sex ratio in the USA has declined over recent decades, resulting in fewer male births. Concurrent changes in the childbearing population may have influenced the sex ratio, including increases in multiple births, improvements in perinatal survival and increased Hispanic births. METHODS: Data from the US natality files (1981-2006) were analyzed to determine the impact of changes in birth characteristics on male birth proportion. Male birth proportion was calculated as the number of male births divided by the total number. In separate analyses, trends in male birth proportion from 1981 to 2006 were adjusted for plurality (singleton, multiple), gestational age (< 28, 28-32, 33-36, >= 37 weeks) and, from 1989, maternal Hispanic ethnicity. Separate analyses were conducted for white and black births. Log binomial regression was performed to estimate crude and adjusted trends with year as independent variable. RESULTS: Trends in male birth proportion differed significantly according to plurality among white (P < 0.01), but not black births. Adjustment for gestational age tempered the trends among white singletons (P < 0.0001) and multiples (P < 0.05) but had no effect on trends in black male birth proportion. Adjustment for Hispanic ethnicity had no impact on trends in black male birth proportion and any effect on white births was negated by changes in gestational age trends. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of consistent influences on, or patterns of change in, the proportion of male births between different subpopulations of births suggests that a single mechanism is unlikely to explain the oft-referenced decrease in the overall US sex ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:2936 / 2944
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] A United States national reference for fetal growth
    Alexander, GR
    Himes, JH
    Kaufman, RB
    Mor, J
    Kogan, M
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [2] Trivers-Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983-2001
    Almond, Douglas
    Edlund, Lena
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 274 (1624) : 2491 - 2496
  • [3] Association of secondary sex ratio with smoking and parity
    Beratis, Nicholas G.
    Asimacopoulou, Aspasia
    Varvarigou, Anastasia
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (03) : 662 - 667
  • [4] Ratio of boys to girls at birth - Is not related to the time taken to conceive, or exposure to environmental agents
    Bonde, Jens Peter Ellekilde
    Wilcox, Allen
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7592): : 486 - 487
  • [5] The effects of counseling for choosing a field of study
    Brandstätter, H
    Grillich, L
    Farthofer, A
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2002, 16 (01): : 15 - 28
  • [6] Disparities in infant mortality: What's genetics got to do with it?
    David, Richard
    Collins, James, Jr.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 97 (07) : 1191 - 1197
  • [7] Declines in sex ratio at birth and fetal deaths in Japan, and in US whites but not African Americans
    Davis, Devra Lee
    Webster, Pamela
    Stainthorpe, Hillary
    Chilton, Janice
    Jones, Lovell
    Doi, Rikuo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (06) : 941 - 946
  • [8] DICKEY RP, 1995, HUM REPROD, V10, P2465
  • [9] Declining male births with increasing geographical latitude in Europe
    Grech, V
    Vassallo-Agius, P
    Savona-Ventura, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (04) : 244 - 246
  • [10] Natural variation in the human sex ratio
    Jacobsen, R
    Moller, H
    Mouritsen, A
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (12) : 3120 - 3125