An assessment of ECMWF and NCEP-NCAR Reanalyses in the Southern Hemisphere at the end of the presatellite era: Results from the EOLE experiment (1971-72)

被引:17
作者
Hertzog, Albert [1 ]
Basdevant, Claude [1 ]
Vial, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, IPSL, CNRS, Meteorol Dynam Lab, Palaiseau, France
关键词
RADIATIVE-TRANSFER; OBSERVING-SYSTEM; BALLOON FLIGHTS; STORM TRACKS; TRENDS; PARAMETERIZATION; TEMPERATURE; CIRCULATION;
D O I
10.1175/MWR3256.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This article estimates the biases and standard deviations of the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) and the 50-yr National Centers for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP-NCAR) Reanalysis (NN50) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in 1971-72. These estimates are obtained by comparing the reanalyzed temperatures and winds with EOLE observations, a dataset collected during 480 superpressure-ballon flights in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). Dedicated algorithms have been developped to control the quality of this dataset and a stringent selection has been performed on the observations. None of the atmospheric centers has assimilated the EOLE dataset, which is therefore fully independent from the reanalyses. It is furthermore argued that the statistics obtained in this study at the end of the presatellite era may be representative of the reanalysis accuracy since 1957. The results of these comparisons indicate that NN50 tends to be a few degrees colder than the observations in the SH subpolar latitudes, while ERA-40 is less hit by this cold-pole issue. Both reanalyses, on the other hand, are found to be warmer than the observations by about 1 K in the subtropics. In contrast, the wind comparisons only exhibit nonsignificant or small reanalysis biases, even though the reanalyzed subtropical jet is slightly displaced equatorward with respect to the observations. The ability of reanalyses to capture the atmospheric synoptic-scale variability in the upper troposphere is assessed by computing the standard deviations of the reanalysis minus observation differences. The ERA-40 and NN50 standard deviations show a maximum (i.e., a poorer reanalysis accuracy) in the SH storm track. However, ERA-40 standard deviations are found to be much larger than NN50 standard deviations. The standard deviations also exhibit a marked decrease above the continents, stressing the heterogeneity of the atmospheric observation network during the presatellite era. Finally, in contrast with previous studies, the reanalysis accuracy does not appear to be better during summer than during winter.
引用
收藏
页码:3367 / 3383
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Alpert J.C., 1988, Am Meteorol Soc, P726
[2]  
[Anonymous], ERA 40 PROJECT REP S
[3]   Sensitivity of the ERA40 reanalysis to the observing system: determination of the global atmospheric circulation from reduced observations [J].
Bengtsson, L ;
Hodges, KI ;
Hagemann, S .
TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2004, 56 (05) :456-471
[4]   Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? [J].
Bengtsson, L ;
Hagemann, S ;
Hodges, KI .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D11) :D111111-8
[5]   Observing-system experiments in the ECMWF 4D-Var data assimilation system [J].
Bouttier, F ;
Kelly, G .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 127 (574) :1469-1488
[6]   Strong trends in the skill of the ERA-40 and NCEP-NCAR reanalyses in the high and midlatitudes of the southern hemisphere, 1958-2001 [J].
Bromwich, DH ;
Fogt, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (23) :4603-4619
[7]  
CADET D, 1973, THESIS U PARIS
[8]  
CADET D, 1974, 62 CNRS LAB MET DYN
[9]  
FELS SB, 1975, J ATMOS SCI, V32, P1475, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1475:TSEAAN>2.0.CO
[10]  
2