Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis.

被引:965
作者
Mora-Duarte, J
Betts, R
Rotstein, C
Colombo, AL
Thompson-Moya, L
Smietana, J
Lupinacci, R
Sable, C
Kartsonis, N
Perfect, J
机构
[1] CCSS, Neeman ICIC & Hosp Mexico, San Jose, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] UNIFESP, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Clin Santa Maria, Santiago, Chile
[6] Merck Res Labs, W Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa021585
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Caspofungin is an echinocandin agent with fungicidal activity against candida species. We performed a double-blind trial to compare caspofungin with amphotericin B deoxycholate for the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. Methods: We enrolled patients who had clinical evidence of infection and a positive culture for candida species from blood or another site. Patients were stratified according to the severity of disease, as indicated by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, and the presence or absence of neutropenia and were randomly assigned to receive either caspofungin or amphotericin B. The study was designed to compare the efficacy of caspofungin with that of amphotericin B in patients with invasive candidiasis and in a subgroup with candidemia. Results: Of the 239 patients enrolled, 224 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Base-line characteristics, including the percentage of patients with neutropenia and the mean APACHE II score, were similar in the two treatment groups. A modified intention-to-treat analysis showed that the efficacy of caspofungin was similar to that of amphotericin B, with successful outcomes in 73.4 percent of the patients treated with caspofungin and in 61.7 percent of those treated with amphotericin B (difference after adjustment for APACHE II score and neutropenic status, 12.7 percentage points; 95.6 percent confidence interval, -0.7 to 26.0). An analysis of patients who met prespecified criteria for evaluation showed that caspofungin was superior, with a favorable response in 80.7 percent of patients, as compared with 64.9 percent of those who received amphotericin B (difference, 15.4 percentage points; 95.6 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 29.7). Caspofungin was as effective as amphotericin B in patients who had candidemia, with a favorable response in 71.7 percent and 62.8 percent of patients, respectively (difference, 10.0 percentage points; 95.0 percent confidence interval, -4.5 to 24.5). There were significantly fewer drug-related adverse events in the caspofungin group than in the amphotericin B group. Conclusions: Caspofungin is at least as effective as amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and, more specifically, candidemia.
引用
收藏
页码:2020 / 2029
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Evaluation of the echinocandin antifungal MK-0991 (L-743,872): Efficacies in mouse models of disseminated aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis [J].
Abruzzo, GK ;
Flattery, AM ;
Gill, CJ ;
Kong, L ;
Smith, JG ;
Pikounis, VB ;
Balkovec, JM ;
Bouffard, AF ;
Dropinski, JF ;
Rosen, H ;
Kropp, H ;
Bartizal, K .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (11) :2333-2338
[2]   Management of invasive candidal infections: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature [J].
Anaissie, EJ ;
Darouiche, RO ;
AbiSaid, D ;
Uzun, O ;
Mera, J ;
Gentry, LO ;
Williams, T ;
Kontoyiannis, DP ;
Karl, CL ;
Bodey, GP .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 23 (05) :964-972
[3]   Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in the treatment of hematogenous candidiasis: A matched cohort study [J].
Anaissie, EJ ;
Vartivarian, SE ;
AbiSaid, D ;
Uzun, O ;
Pinczowski, H ;
Kontoyiannis, DP ;
Khoury, P ;
Papadakis, K ;
Gardner, A ;
Raad, II ;
Gilbreath, J ;
Bodey, GP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 101 (02) :170-176
[4]   Randomized, double-blind, Multicenter study of caspofungin versus amphotericin B for treatment of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiases [J].
Arathoon, EG ;
Gotuzzo, E ;
Noriega, LM ;
Berman, RS ;
DiNubile, MJ ;
Sable, CA .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (02) :451-457
[5]   Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: An international consensus [J].
Ascioglu, S ;
Rex, JH ;
de Pauw, B ;
Bennett, JE ;
Bille, J ;
Crokaert, F ;
Denning, DW ;
Donnelly, JP ;
Edwards, JE ;
Erjavec, Z ;
Fiere, D ;
Lortholary, O ;
Maertens, J ;
Meis, JF ;
Patterson, TF ;
Ritter, J ;
Selleslag, D ;
Shah, PM ;
Stevens, DA ;
Walsh, TJ .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (01) :7-14
[6]  
BACHMAN SP, 2000, 40 INT C ANT AG CHEM, P352
[7]  
Barchiesi F, 1999, EUR J CLIN MICROBIOL, V18, P302
[8]   In vitro preclinical evaluation studies with the echinocandin antifungal MK-0991 (L-743,872) [J].
Bartizal, K ;
Gill, CJ ;
Abruzzo, GK ;
Flattery, AM ;
Kong, L ;
Scott, PM ;
Smith, JG ;
Leighton, CE ;
Bouffard, A ;
Dropinski, JF ;
Balkovec, J .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (11) :2326-2332
[9]  
BODEY GP, 1992, CANDIDIASIS PATHOGEN, P279
[10]  
Colombo AL, 1999, DIAGN MICR INFEC DIS, V34, P281