The use of carbon fibre material in radiographic cassettes: Estimation of the dose and contrast advantages

被引:13
作者
Dance, DR
Lester, SA
Carlsson, GA
Sandborg, M
Persliden, J
机构
[1] INST CANC RES,LONDON SW3 6JJ,ENGLAND
[2] LINKOPING UNIV,FAC HLTH SCI,DEPT RADIAT PHYS,S-58185 LINKOPING,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.70.832.9166075
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A Monte Carlo simulation has been used to estimate the dose and contrast advantages of replacing radiographic cassette fronts fabricated from aluminium with cassette fronts fabricated from low atomic number material (carbon fibre). The simulation used a realistic imaging geometry and calculations were made both with and without an anti-scatter grid. Account was taken of the scatter generated in the cassette front and the effect of beam hardening on primary contrast. Dose and contrast were evaluated for a range of cassette front thicknesses and tube potentials (60-150 kV) as well as for four examinations representative of situations with varying amounts of scatter. The results with an anti-scatter grid show a clear dose and contrast advantage in all cases when an aluminium cassette front is replaced with a low attenuation cassette front. The contrast advantage is dependent upon the examination and is generally greater for imaging bony structures than for imaging soft tissue. If a 1.74 mm aluminium cassette front is compared with a 1.1 mm carbon fibre cassette front, then the dose advantages are 16%, 9%, 8% and 6% and the contrast advantages are 10%, 7%, 4% and 5% for the AP paediatric pelvis examination at 60 kV, the anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine examination at 80 kV, the lateral lumbar spine examination at 100 kV and the posteroanterior (PA) chest examination at 150 kV, respectively. The results without an anti-scatter grid show an increased dose advantage when a low attenuation cassette front is used, but the contrast advantage is small and in some situations negative.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 390
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
AVISON M, 1989, OPTIMIZATION IMAGE Q, P166
[2]   WHAT IS A REASONABLE COST FOR PROTECTION AGAINST RADIATION AND OTHER RISKS [J].
BENGTSSON, G ;
MOBERG, L .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 1993, 64 (06) :661-666
[3]  
HAUS AG, 1980, APPL OPTICAL INSTRUM, V233, P269
[4]  
HUFTON AP, 1986, BRIT J RADIOL, V59, P157, DOI 10.1259/0007-1285-59-698-157
[5]  
National Radiological Protection Board, 1990, PAT DOS RED DIAGN RA, V1
[6]  
RICHTER D, 1981, PATIENT EXPOSURE RAD, P175
[7]   MONTE-CARLO STUDY OF GRID PERFORMANCE IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY - TASK-DEPENDENT OPTIMIZATION FOR SCREEN-FILM IMAGING [J].
SANDBORG, M ;
DANCE, DR ;
CARLSSON, GA ;
PERSLIDEN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (793) :76-85
[8]   A MONTE-CARLO PROGRAM FOR THE CALCULATION OF CONTRAST, NOISE AND ABSORBED DOSE IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY [J].
SANDBORG, M ;
DANCE, DR ;
PERSLIDEN, J ;
CARLSSON, GA .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1994, 42 (03) :167-180
[9]   SELECTION OF ANTI-SCATTER GRIDS FOR DIFFERENT IMAGING TASKS - THE ADVANTAGE OF LOW ATOMIC-NUMBER COVER AND INTERSPACE MATERIALS [J].
SANDBORG, M ;
DANCE, DR ;
CARLSSON, GA ;
PERSLIDEN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (792) :1151-1163
[10]   A MONTE-CARLO STUDY OF GRID PERFORMANCE IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY - TASK-DEPENDENT OPTIMIZATION FOR DIGITAL IMAGING [J].
SANDBORG, M ;
DANCE, DR ;
CARLSSON, GA ;
PERSLIDEN, J ;
TAPIOVAARA, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1659-1676