Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment

被引:594
作者
Giles-Corti, B [1 ]
Donovan, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Populat Hlth, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
walking; environment and public health; physical activity; socioeconomic status (SES);
D O I
10.1006/pmed.2002.1115
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Spatial access to recreational facilities and perceptions of the neighborhood environment and physical activity levels were examined by the socioeconomic status of area of residence (SES). Methods. A cross-sectional survey of adults (18-59 years) (n = 1,803) stratified by SES using a geographic-based index was conducted. Results. Respondents in low SES areas had superior spatial access to many recreational facilities, but were less likely to use them compared with those living in high SES areas. They were more likely to perceive that they had access to sidewalks and shops, but also perceived that their neighborhood was busier with traffic, less attractive, and less supportive of walking. After adjustment, respondents living in low SES areas were 36% less likely to undertake vigorous activity. While they were more likely to walk for transport, this was not statistically significant (OR, 1.27; 95% Cl, 0.98-1.64), nor were other SES differences in walking for recreation and walking as recommended. Modifiable environmental factors were associated with walking and vigorous activity, especially perceived access to sidewalks and neighborhood attractiveness. Spatial access to attractive, public open space was associated with walking. Conclusions. Creating supportive environments-particularly sidewalks in attractive neighborhoods-has the potential to increase walking and vigorous activity. (C) 2002 American Health Foundation and Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 611
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   COMPENDIUM OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES - CLASSIFICATION OF ENERGY COSTS OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
HASKELL, WL ;
LEON, AS ;
JACOBS, DR ;
MONTOYE, HJ ;
SALLIS, JF ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1993, 25 (01) :71-80
[2]  
ARMSTRONG T, 2000, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PA
[3]   Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults [J].
Ball, K ;
Bauman, A ;
Leslie, E ;
Owen, N .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) :434-440
[4]   Geographical influences upon physical activity participation: evidence of a 'coastal effect' [J].
Bauman, A ;
Smith, B ;
Stoker, L ;
Bellew, B ;
Booth, M .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 23 (03) :322-324
[5]  
BAUMAN A, 1996, NSW HLTH PROMOTION S
[6]  
Beatley T., 2000, Green urbanism: Learning from European cities
[7]   Promoting physical activity in rural communities - Walking trail access, use, and effects [J].
Brownson, RC ;
Housemann, RA ;
Brown, DR ;
Jackson-Thompson, J ;
King, AC ;
Malone, BR ;
Sallis, JF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (03) :235-241
[8]   Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States [J].
Brownson, RC ;
Baker, EA ;
Housemann, RA ;
Brennan, LK ;
Bacak, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (12) :1995-2003
[9]  
BULL F, 2000, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LE
[10]  
CAULEY JA, 1991, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V23, P343