Technical cost of radiologic examinations: Analysis across imaging modalities

被引:46
作者
Saini, S
Seltzer, SE
Bramson, RT
Levine, LA
Kelly, P
Jordan, PF
Chiango, BF
Thrall, JH
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; computed tomography (CT); utilization; economics; medical; interventional procedures; magnetic resonance (MR); radiography; radionuclide imaging; ultrasound; (US);
D O I
10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl18269
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the individual technical costs of general diagnostic radiographic, ultrasonographic (US), computed tomographic (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and scintigraphic examinations and interventional radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiology Cost and Productivity Benchmarking Study method of the University HealthSystem Consortium, a cooperative group of academic medical centers, was modified and extended to the six imaging modalities in a tertiary care academic setting. Hospital billing and cost records were analyzed for fiscal year 1996. Costs were divided into labor and nonlabor categories and were allocated to individual imaging modalities on the basis of resources consumed. Physician cost and hospital overhead were not included. Unit costs were analyzed per technical relative value unit (RVU) and per examination. RESULTS: The costs per technical RVU for diagnostic radiography, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $65.06, $28.74, $20.95, $17.69, $42.19, and $89.03, respectively. The technical costs per examination for diagnostic radiography, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $41.92, $50.28, $112.32, $266.96, $196.88, and $692.60, respectively. CONCLUSION: The method of unit cost analysis for individual imaging modalities was successfully tested in a tertiary care setting. The method should be adopted to allow cost comparison across many institutions, which will permit the promotion of best practices.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 272
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] NEW IMAGING TECHNOLOGY AND COST-CONTAINMENT
    HILLMAN, BJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (03) : 503 - 506
  • [2] RESOURCE-BASED RELATIVE VALUES - AN OVERVIEW
    HSIAO, WC
    BRAUN, P
    DUNN, D
    BECKER, ER
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (16): : 2347 - 2353
  • [3] KIRSCHNER CG, 1996, PHYSICIANS CURRENT P
  • [4] *U HLTH SYST CONS, 1996, RAD COST PROD BENCHM