Spatial and seasonal effects confounding interpretation of sunflower yields in Argentina

被引:22
作者
Chapman, SC
de la Vega, AJ
机构
[1] Advanta Semillas SAIC, RA-2600 Venado Tuerto, Argentina
[2] CSIRO Plant Ind, Long Pocket Labs, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia
关键词
G x E interaction; heritability; pattern analysis; phenotypic variance components; sunflower; yield components;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00185-X
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Sunflower in Argentina is grown in subtropical (northern) and temperate (central and southern) environments. These environments can substantially complicate hybrid selection due to large genotype x environment (G x E) interactions. The spatial and seasonal differences between and within central and northern regions were investigated through two complementary approaches: (i) pattern analysis was applied to a long-term environmental data record, in order to group environments based on the mean value of each variable for the different crop stages in a range of years and locations, (ii) a trial dataset, comprising 68 trials, covering 8 years (Y) and 18 locations (L), was analyzed to quantify G, E, and G x E variance components for grain yield, oil concentration and oil yield. Pattern analysis of environmental data separates northern and central environments over both years and locations. Northern environments had shorter photoperiods, less rainfall and lower temperatures during vegetative phases; shorter photopetiods during flowering, and higher temperatures during grain filling. Seasonal differences in trial yield were highly associated with rainfall during reproductive phases. Residual maximum likelihood analyses detected that 86% (central region) and 83% (northern region) of the total G x E interaction for oil yield was attributable to G x L x Y. The relatively low G x L interaction compared with G x L x Y implies that broad adaptation within regions is required. To achieve repeatabilities of more than 80%, trials would need to be conducted over at least 6 years with 15 locations per year. Environmental differences between regions showed a strong degree of repeatability, and were consistent with differences in magnitude of G x E interactions for oil yield components. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 120
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Genotype x environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia [J].
Basford, KE ;
Cooper, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1998, 49 (02) :153-174
[3]   ANALYSIS OF CLIMATIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR PLANT-BREEDING PURPOSES [J].
BOYD, WJR ;
GOODCHILD, NA ;
WATERHOUSE, WK ;
SINGH, BB .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1976, 27 (01) :19-33
[4]   Number of seeds per unit area in sunflower correlates well with a photothermal quotient [J].
Cantagallo, JE ;
Chimenti, CA ;
Hall, AJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (06) :1780-1786
[5]   Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield [J].
Chapman, SC ;
Cooper, M ;
Butler, DG ;
Henzell, RG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2000, 51 (02) :197-207
[6]   Genotype by environment effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize .1. Two mode pattern analysis of yield [J].
Chapman, SC ;
Crossa, J ;
Edmeades, GO .
EUPHYTICA, 1997, 95 (01) :1-9
[7]  
Comstock R. E., 1977, Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, August 16-21, 1976., P705
[8]   A SELECTION STRATEGY TO ACCOMMODATE GENOTYPE-BY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR GRAIN-YIELD OF WHEAT - MANAGED-ENVIRONMENTS FOR SELECTION AMONG GENOTYPES [J].
COOPER, M ;
WOODRUFF, DR ;
EISEMANN, RL ;
BRENNAN, PS ;
DELACY, IH .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1995, 90 (3-4) :492-502
[9]  
Cooper M., 1996, P193
[10]   Genotype by environment interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower I. Two-mode pattern analysis of oil and biomass yield across environments in Argentina [J].
de la Vega, AJ ;
Chapman, SC ;
Hall, AJ .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2001, 72 (01) :17-38