Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness

被引:73
作者
Kang, S. -H. [1 ]
Kim, H. K. [1 ]
Ham, C. K. [1 ]
Lee, D. S. [1 ]
Cho, H. -I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
Automated hematology analyzer; clinical usefulness; leukocyte differential count;
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.00981.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
We evaluated the clinical usefulness (leukocyte distribution classification, morphologic classification, and morphologic flags) of the following four hematology analyzers: CELL-DYN Sapphire (CD-Sapphire) (Abbott Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA, USA), ADVIA 120 (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA), Beckman Coulter LH 750 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA), and Sysmex XE-2100 (TOA Medical Electronics Co., Kobe, Japan). Four hundred thirty samples from patients and 100 samples from healthy individuals were analyzed. For distributional classification, the sensitivity rates of CD-Sapphire, ADVIA 120, LH 750, and XE-2100 were 93.1, 95.9, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively, and the efficiency rates were 80.7, 81.6, 84.1, and 84.2%, respectively. For morphologic classification, the sensitivity rates of CD-Sapphire, ADVIA 120, LH 750, and XE-2100 were 88.6, 93.2, 77.3, and 94.3%, respectively, and the efficiency rates were 80.9, 73.0, 79.5, and 74.2%, respectively. Comparing the findings in different morphologic flags, XE-2100 showed the highest sensitivity for Blasts flag (90.9%); CD-Sapphire showed the highest sensitivity for Immature granulocytes and/or Left-shift flag (85.5%); ADVIA 120 showed the highest sensitivity for Atypical lymphocytes flag (60.0%); and LH 750 showed the highest sensitivity for Nucleated RBC flag (75.0%). Our results demonstrate that the four analyzers are comparable in overall performance.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 486
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Analytic performance of the PENTRA 80 automated blood cell analyzer for the evaluation of normal and pathologic WBCs [J].
Arroyo, ME ;
Tabernero, MD ;
García-Marcos, MA ;
Orfao, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 123 (02) :206-214
[2]
Aulesa C, 2003, Lab Hematol, V9, P15
[3]
A PARALLEL EVALUATION OF 4 AUTOMATED HEMATOLOGY ANALYZERS [J].
BENTLEY, SA ;
JOHNSON, A ;
BISHOP, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 100 (06) :626-632
[4]
Buttarello M, 1997, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V108, P674
[5]
JONES RG, 1998, LAB HEMATOLOGY, V4, P34
[6]
Simultaneous differentiation and quantitation of erythroblasts and white blood cells on a high throughput clinical haematology analyser [J].
Kim, YR ;
Yee, M ;
Metha, S ;
Chupp, V ;
Kendall, R ;
Scott, CS .
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 1998, 20 (01) :21-29
[7]
Accurate basophils counting: not an easy goal! [J].
Lesesve, JF ;
Benbih, M ;
Lecompte, T .
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 2005, 27 (02) :143-144
[8]
Muller Robert, 2006, Lab Hematol, V12, P15, DOI 10.1532/LH96.05041
[9]
*NCCLS, 1992, H20A NCCLS
[10]
Ruzicka K, 2001, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V125, P391