Assessing the state of organizational safety - Culture or climate?

被引:153
作者
Mearns, KJ [1 ]
Flin, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Psychol, Old Aberdeen AB24 2UB, Scotland
关键词
Safety Culture; Safety Performance; Current Psychology; Organisational Climate; Safety Climate;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-999-1013-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article explores the concepts of safety culture and safety climate in an attempt to determine which is the more useful for describing an organization's "state of safety." From a review of the literature purporting to measure safety culture or safety climate, it is argued that, although the two terms are often interchangeable, they are actually distinct but related concepts and should be treated accordingly. The term "safety climate" best describes employees' perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about risk and safety, typically measured by questionnaire surveys and providing a "snapshot" of the current state of safety. "Safety culture" is a more complex and enduring trait reflecting fundamental values, norms, assumptions and expectations, which to some extent reside in societal culture. The expression of these "cultural" elements, perhaps, can be seen through safety management practices which are reflected in the safety climate. Basically, measurement of safety culture requires in-depth investigation including an analysis of how organizational members interact to form a shared view of safety.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 17
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*ACSNI, 1993, HUM FACT STUD GROUP
[2]  
ALEXANDER M, 1995, UND RISK PERC C AB F
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, INT REV IND ORG PSYC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ORG CLIMATE CULTURE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, 2 WORLD BANK WORKSHO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, IMPROVING SAFETY CUL
[7]  
ASHFORTH B, 1985, ACAD MANAGE REV, V18, P837
[8]  
BLACKMORE GA, 1997, IADC N SEA SEM PERF
[9]  
BROWNE DH, 1986, J FAMILY VIOLENCE, V1, P289
[10]   BEHAVIORAL NORMS AND EXPECTATIONS - A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE [J].
COOKE, RA ;
ROUSSEAU, DM .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1988, 13 (03) :245-273