Rapid slide latex agglutination test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

被引:91
作者
van Griethuysen, A
Pouw, M
van Leeuwen, N
Heck, M
Willemse, P
Buiting, A
Kluytmans, J
机构
[1] St Elisabeth Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, NL-5000 AS Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm Protect, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] St Ignatius Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Breda, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.37.9.2789-2792.1999
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd.), a commercially available, rapid (20-min) slide latex agglutination test for the determination of methicillin resistance by detection of PBP 2a in Staphylococcus aureus, was compared with the oxacillin agar screen test and PCR detection of the mecA gene. A total of 563 S. aureus isolates were tested. Two hundred ninety-six of the isolates were methicillin-susceptible isolates from cultures of blood from consecutive patients. Also, 267 methicillin-resistant isolates that comprised 248 different phage types were tested. Methicillin resistance was defined as the presence of the mecA gene. Of the 267 mecA gene-positive isolates, 263 were positive by the MRSA screen test (sensitivity, 98.5%), and all the mecA-gene negative strains were negative by the MRSA screen test (specificity, 100%). The oxacillin agar screen test detected methicillin resistance in 250 of the mecA gene-positive isolates (sensitivity, 93.6%). The sensitivity of the MRSA screen test was statistically significantly higher than the sensitivity of the oxacillin agar screen test (P < 0.05). The MRSA screen test is a highly sensitive and specific test for the detection of methicillin resistance. Also, it offers results within half an hour and is easy to perform, which makes this test a valuable tool in the ongoing battle against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
引用
收藏
页码:2789 / 2792
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications
    Chambers, HF
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 10 (04) : 781 - +
  • [2] Resistance of staphylococci in The Netherlands: surveillance by an electronic network during 1989-1995
    de Neeling, AJ
    van Leeuwen, WJ
    Schouls, LM
    Schot, CS
    van Veen-Rutgers, A
    Beunders, AJ
    Buiting, AGM
    Hol, C
    Ligtvoet, EEJ
    Petit, PL
    Sabbe, LJM
    van Griethuysen, AJA
    van Embden, JDA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 41 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [3] TOUCHDOWN PCR TO CIRCUMVENT SPURIOUS PRIMING DURING GENE AMPLIFICATION
    DON, RH
    COX, PT
    WAINWRIGHT, BJ
    BAKER, K
    MATTICK, JS
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1991, 19 (14) : 4008 - 4008
  • [4] Esveld M I, 1999, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V143, P205
  • [5] Comparison of ATB Staph, Rapid ATB Staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA
    Frebourg, NB
    Nouet, D
    Lemée, L
    Martin, E
    Lemeland, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) : 52 - 57
  • [6] FRENAY HME, 1994, THESIS U UTRECHT UTR
  • [7] GEBERDING JL, 1991, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V35, P2574
  • [8] MULTIPLEX PCR FOR IDENTIFICATION OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY
    GEHA, DJ
    UHL, JR
    GUSTAFERRO, CA
    PERSING, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (07) : 1768 - 1772
  • [9] METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI - DETECTION METHODS AND TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS
    HACKBARTH, CJ
    CHAMBERS, HF
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 33 (07) : 995 - 999
  • [10] Kloos Wesley E., 1995, P282