Change Detection Accuracy and Image Properties: A Study Using Simulated Data

被引:49
作者
Almutairi, Abdullah [2 ]
Warner, Timothy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Geol & Geog, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Univ, Dept Geog, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
REMOTE SENSING | 2010年 / 2卷 / 06期
关键词
change detection; post-classification comparison; change classification; image differencing; principal component analysis; change vector analysis; simulated data;
D O I
10.3390/rs2061508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Simulated data were used to investigate the relationships between image properties and change detection accuracy in a systematic manner. The image properties examined were class separability, radiometric normalization and image spectral band-to-band correlation. The change detection methods evaluated were post-classification comparison, direct classification of multidate imagery, image differencing, principal component analysis, and change vector analysis. The simulated data experiments showed that the relative accuracy of the change detection methods varied with changes in image properties, thus confirming the hypothesis that caution should be used in generalizing from studies that use only a single image pair. In most cases, direct classification and post-classification comparison were the least sensitive to changes in the image properties of class separability, radiometric normalization error and band correlation. Furthermore, these methods generally produced the highest accuracy, or were amongst those with a high accuracy. PCA accuracy was highly variable; the use of four principal components consistently resulted in substantial decreased classification accuracy relative to using six components, or classification using the original six bands. The accuracy of image differencing also varied greatly in the experiments. Of the three methods that require radiometric normalization, image differencing was the method most affected by radiometric error, relative to change vector and classification methods, for classes that have moderate and low separability. For classes that are highly separable, image differencing was relatively unaffected by radiometric normalization error. CVA was found to be the most accurate method for classes with low separability and all but the largest radiometric errors. CVA accuracy tended to be the least affected by changes in the degree of band correlation in situations where the class means were moderately dispersed, or clustered near the diagonal. For all change detection methods, the classification accuracy increased as simulated band correlation increased, and direct classification methods consistently had the highest accuracy, while PCA generally had the lowest accuracy
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1529
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Almutairi A, 2004, THESIS W VIRGINIA U
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Proceedings of the 6th Annual Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, West Lafayette, IN, 3-6 June 1980
[3]  
Brovolo F., 2007, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V45, P218
[4]   Modelling geometric and misregistration error in airborne sensor data to enhance change detection [J].
Brown, K. M. ;
Foody, G. M. ;
Atkinson, P. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 28 (12) :2857-2879
[5]   An adaptive approach to reducing registration noise effects in unsupervised change detection [J].
Bruzzone, L ;
Cossu, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (11) :2455-2465
[6]  
CASTELLI V, 1998, REMOTE SENSING CHANG, P53
[7]   Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis [J].
Chen, J ;
Gong, P ;
He, CY ;
Pu, RL ;
Shi, PJ .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 69 (04) :369-379
[8]  
COHEN W., 1998, REMOTE SENSING CHANG, P89
[9]   The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection [J].
Dai, XL ;
Khorram, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 36 (05) :1566-1577
[10]   PCA-based land-use change detection and analysis using multitemporal and multisensor satellite data [J].
Deng, J. S. ;
Wang, K. ;
Deng, Y. H. ;
Qi, G. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 29 (16) :4823-4838