Biapenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: Report from a Swedish study group

被引:25
作者
Brismar, B
Akerlund, JE
Sjostedt, S
Johansson, C
Tornqvist, A
Backstrand, B
Bang, H
Andaker, L
Gustafsson, PO
Darle, N
Angeras, M
Falk, A
Tunevall, G
KasholmTengve, B
Skau, T
Nystrom, PO
Gasslander, T
Hagelback, A
OlssonLiljequist, B
Eklund, AE
Nord, CE
机构
[1] HUDDINGE UNIV HOSP,DEPT MICROBIOL F88,S-14186 HUDDINGE,SWEDEN
[2] STOCKHOLM SODER HOSP,STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN
[3] DANDERYD HOSP,S-18288 DANDERYD,SWEDEN
[4] OSTRA HOSP,S-41685 GOTHENBURG,SWEDEN
[5] OREBRO MED CTR HOSP,OREBRO,SWEDEN
[6] LINKOPING HOSP,LINKOPING,SWEDEN
[7] SWEDISH INST INFECT DIS CONTROL,STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.3109/00365549609037949
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
118 patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections participated in an open randomized comparative multicenter trial in order to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of biapenem with imipenem/cilastatin (Tienam). 31 men and 27 women (mean age 52.3 years) were enrolled in the biapenem group, and 43 men and 17 women (mean age 52.3 years) in the imipenem/cilastatin group, The patients received either biapenem 500 mg every 8 h or imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg every 6 h by intravenous infusion for up to 13 days (mean 6.5 days). 28/43 evaluable patients (65.1%) receiving biapenem and 27/40 evaluable patients (67.5%) in the imipenem/cilastatin group were clinically cured. The microbiological response was satisfactory in 28/43 evaluable patients (65.1%) receiving biapenem and in 27/40 evaluable patients (67.5%) receiving imipenem/cilastatin. No significant differences in clinical or microbiological efficacy between the two treatment groups were found. The present study shows that biapenem may be useful in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 512
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, ACTA PATHOL MIC SC
[2]   PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM VERSUS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN FOR TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
BRISMAR, B ;
MALMBORG, AS ;
TUNEVALL, G ;
WRETLIND, B ;
BERGMAN, L ;
MENTZING, LO ;
NYSTROM, PO ;
KIHLSTROM, E ;
BACKSTRAND, B ;
SKAU, T ;
KASHOLMTENGVE, B ;
SJOBERG, L ;
OLSSONLILJEQUIST, B ;
TALLY, FP ;
GATENBECK, L ;
EKLUND, AE ;
NORD, CE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 36 (12) :2766-2773
[3]   INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTION - DIFFERENCES IN PRESENTATION AND OUTCOME BETWEEN YOUNGER PATIENTS AND THE ELDERLY [J].
COOPER, GS ;
SHLAES, DM ;
SALATA, RA .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 19 (01) :146-148
[4]  
KAGER L, 1985, REV INFECT DIS S3, V7, P518
[5]   APACHE-II - A SEVERITY OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
DRAPER, EA ;
WAGNER, DP ;
ZIMMERMAN, JE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (10) :818-829
[6]   INVITRO ACTIVITY OF L-627 AGAINST ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA [J].
NORD, CE ;
LINDMARK, A ;
PERSSON, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 11 (08) :757-760
[7]  
NORD CE, 1994, RECENT ADV CHEMOTHER, P506
[8]  
OHMANN C, 1993, EUR J SURG, V159, P267
[9]   EVALUATION OF NEW ANTIINFECTIVE DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
SOLOMKIN, JS ;
HEMSELL, DL ;
SWEET, R ;
TALLY, F ;
BARTLETT, J .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 15 :S33-S42
[10]   RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER TRIAL COMPARING IMIPENEM CILASTATIN TO TOBRAMYCIN CLINDAMYCIN FOR INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
SOLOMKIN, JS ;
DELLINGER, EP ;
CHRISTOU, NV ;
BUSUTTIL, RW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 212 (05) :581-591