An Item Response analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using shared data from two pharmaceutical companies

被引:48
作者
Evans, KR [1 ]
Sills, T
DeBrota, DJ
Gelwicks, S
Engelhardt, N
Santor, D
机构
[1] Axon Clin Res, Toronto, ON M5V 3B5, Canada
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychiat, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2003.11.003
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Although the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) remains the most widely used outcome measure in clinical trials of Major Depressive Disorder, the psychometric properties of the individual HAMD items have not been extensively studied. In the present paper, data from four separate clinical trials conducted independently by two pharmaceutical companies were analyzed to determine the relationship between scores on the individual HAMD items and overall depressive severity in an outpatient population. Option characteristic curves (the probability of scoring a particular option in relation to overall HAMD scores) were generated in order to illustrate the relationship between scoring patterns for each item and the range of total HAMD scores. Results showed that Items 1 (Depressed Mood) and 7 (Work and Activities), and to a lesser degree, Items 2 (Guilt), 10 (Anxiety/Psychic), 11 (Anxiety/Somatic), and 13 (Somatic/General) demonstrated a good relationship between item responses and overall depressive severity. However, other items (e.g. Insight, Hypochondriasis) appeared to be more problematic with regard to their ability to discriminate over the full range of depression severity. The present results illustrate that co-operative data sharing between pharmaceutical companies can be a useful tool for improving clinical methods. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, TESTGRAF PROGRAM GRA
[2]   THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION SCALE - EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVITY USING LOGISTIC-MODELS [J].
BECH, P ;
ALLERUP, P ;
GRAM, LF ;
REISBY, N ;
ROSENBERG, R ;
JACOBSEN, O ;
NAGY, A .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 63 (03) :290-299
[3]  
Benazzi F, 1998, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V13, P570, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199808)13:8<570::AID-GPS813>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-R
[5]  
CICCHETTI DV, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P987
[6]  
ENDICOTT J, 1981, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V38, P98
[7]   EXACTLY WHAT DOES THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE MEASURE [J].
GIBBONS, RD ;
CLARK, DC ;
KUPFER, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (03) :259-273
[8]   ISSUES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF POSTSTROKE DEPRESSION [J].
GORDON, WA ;
HIBBARD, MR ;
EGELKO, S ;
RILEY, E ;
SIMON, D ;
DILLER, L ;
ROSS, ED ;
LIEBERMAN, A .
REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 36 (02) :71-87
[9]  
Guy W., 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN, P217, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2016.11.034
[10]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62