The development of a structured rating schedule (the BAS) to assess skills in breaking bad news

被引:37
作者
Miller, SJ
Hope, T
Talbot, DC
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Warneford Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Wellcome Res Registrar, Oxford OX3 7JX, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Inst Hlth Sci, Div Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ethox, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Imperial Canc Res Fund, Med Oncol Unit, Churchill Hosp, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
breaking bad news; communication skills; assessment; cancer;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6690423
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There has been considerable interest in how doctors break bad news, with calls from within the profession and from patients for doctors to improve their communication skills, In order to aid clinical training and assessment of the skills used in breaking bad news there is a need for a reliable, practical and valid, structured rating schedule. Such a rating schedule was compiled from agreed criteria in the literature, Video-taped recordings of simulated consultations breaking bad news were independently assessed by three raters using the schedule and compared to three experts who gave global ratings. The primary outcome measures were internal consistency of the schedule and level of agreement between raters. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. Agreement between raters using the schedule was moderate to good. The majority of the variation in scores was due to the differences in skills demonstrated in the interviews. The agreement between raters not using the schedule was poor. The BAS provides a simple to use, reliable, and consistent rating schedule for assessing skills used in breaking bad news. It could be a valuable aid to teaching this difficult task.
引用
收藏
页码:792 / 800
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, J R Coll Physicians Lond, V31, P258
  • [2] Cronbach's alpha
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) : 572 - 572
  • [3] BRENNAN P, 1992, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V31, P457
  • [4] STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES
    BRENNAN, P
    SILMAN, A
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840): : 1491 - 1494
  • [5] BUCKMAN R, 1992, BREAK BAD NEW PROTOC
  • [6] Burton MV, 1997, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V6, P47, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199703)6:1<47::AID-PON248>3.3.CO
  • [7] 2-J
  • [8] COMPUTER-BASED INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE CANCER CONSULTATION
    BUTOW, PN
    DUNN, SM
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    JONES, QJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 71 (05) : 1115 - 1121
  • [9] Butow PN, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V77, P2630, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2630::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-S